Teams

Team Bettencourt (CONFIRMED)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - Combo Doubles 18 & Over Qualifier · 7.5 Women - HARRISON

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-08vs Team Beaver (CONFIRMED)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesAshly Keadle / Taryn Sobh vs June Brenner / Kara O'Neill9-8
W#2 DoublesDonna Shewbert / Kimberly Chastain vs Laurie Lanzo / Heather Windbiel8-4
W#3 DoublesMargaret Gaines / Britt SAWYER vs Michelle Smith / Elizabeth Beaver8-2
2026-08-08vs Team Amanda Harvey (CONFIRMED)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesSandy McQueen / Ashley Hooie vs Courtney Potkey / Renee Newell5-8
W#2 DoublesKathryn Bettencourt / Kimberly Chastain vs Kristie Cowan / Lynette Kahue8-5
W#3 DoublesDonna Shewbert / Britt SAWYER vs Kelly Crotts / Kristy Bishop8-2
2026-08-08vs Team Knox (CONFIRMED)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Bettencourt / Ashley Hooie vs Shannon Valentine / Katie Warechowski8-2
W#2 DoublesSandy McQueen / Taryn Sobh vs Lori Stein / Teresa Knox8-2
W#3 DoublesAshly Keadle / Margaret Gaines vs Rosemary Retter / Kelly Lyemance8-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - HARRISON have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Sandy McQueen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Kathryn Bettencourt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Ashly Keadle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Ashley Hooie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Taryn Sobh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Donna Shewbert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Margaret Gaines
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Britt SAWYER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Bettencourt + Donna Shewbert6167% games+13.6% vs expected
Ashley Hooie + Taryn Sobh22367% games+7.7% vs expected
Britt SAWYER + Margaret Gaines10456% games+6.7% vs expected
Ashley Hooie + Sandy McQueen3357% games+6.1% vs expected
Taryn Sobh + Sandy McQueen404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy McQueen
71W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.72
Kathryn Bettencourt
54W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.71
4
Ashly Keadle
36W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Ashley Hooie
119W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Taryn Sobh
88W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Donna Shewbert
22W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Margaret Gaines
34W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
3.5
Britt SAWYER
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.