Teams

AIannuzzi/SPurdy (Charlotte Indoor)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-01vs KCrane (Palisades)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria Sevigny / Jessica Walker vs Jennifer Gluff / Joy Landesman0-6, 0-6
2023-04-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesJill Halverstam / Beth Hahn vs Brittany Clyne / Kendra Neigoot6-4, 6-3
2023-04-03vs MFreeman/EButler (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Sevigny / Lisa Langley vs Edie Butler Rowe / Ellen Underwood6-4, 6-1
2023-03-27vs HHigh/PGolding (Southampton)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Iannuzzi / Jill Halverstam vs Christine Barnes / Denise Bost2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-03-13vs BSwann (Pine Lake)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Hahn / Jill Halverstam vs Tracy Graham / Julie Smallwood5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-03-06vs SAdditon/VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJill Halverstam / Whitney Smith vs Teresa Richardson / Loretta Anderson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Sevigny / Melinda van Hecke vs Sandi Lovell / Sarah Redican4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Whitney Smith
published
3.39
Beth Hahn
published 3.5
3.34
Maria Sevigny
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Jessica Walker
published
3.30
Jill Halverstam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Amy Iannuzzi
published 3.5
3.15
3.04
Susan Blackman
published
2.95
Toni Evans
published
2.93
Lisa Langley
published
2.89
Suzanne Purdy
published
2.57
Melinda van Hecke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Halverstam + Maria Sevigny224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Smith
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Beth Hahn
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Maria Sevigny
105W–47L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Jessica Walker
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Jill Halverstam
90W–46L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Amy Iannuzzi
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Courtney Reichs Mixon
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Susan Blackman
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
Toni Evans
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.95
Lisa Langley
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
Suzanne Purdy
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Carrie Carickhoff
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melinda van Hecke
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%31%69%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.