Teams

Basha - Bashi Bazouks

2024 Montgomery Combo Fall · Montgomery Combo Fall 8.5 Men

18 players · average NTRP 4.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
W#2 DoublesDerek Ireland / J Nathan vs Florian Kogelnik / Ivan Teelucksingh6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesThomas Berray / Ryan Rohn vs Ce Charles Li / Gregory Whitmyer7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesRichard Laukitis / Joshua Folk vs Brendon Smith / W J Peterson6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBarry Weiner / Brent Kendall vs Duane Wright / Tom Oda4-6, 6-5
L#3 DoublesThomas Berray / David Whitall vs Brendon Smith / Shuang Chen5-7, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTzuhsiu Chiou / Bengt Liljas vs Farooq Jaffrey / Martin Morris7-6, 5-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Berray / Brian Bichy vs Seth Yoskowitz / Michael Marcum6-0, 6-2
2024-11-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesDerek Ireland / John Payne vs Randolph Court / Michael Marcum6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHenry Forster / Richard Laukitis vs Shuang Chen / Florian Kogelnik6-2, 7-6
L#1 DoublesHenry Forster / Derek Ireland vs Farooq Jaffrey / Brendon Smith2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJ Nathan / Thomas Berray vs Dennis Weikel / Florian Kogelnik6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBengt Liljas / David Whitall vs Seth Yoskowitz / Michael Marcum7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesBrent Kendall / Barry Weiner vs Florian Kogelnik / Brendon Smith6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDerek Ireland / J Nathan vs Farooq Jaffrey / Benjamin Weiser7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Berray / John Payne vs Dennis Weikel / Martin Morris6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDerek Ireland / Scott Miller vs W J Peterson / Brendon Smith0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRichard Laukitis / Ryan Rohn vs Florian Kogelnik / Tom Oda6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBengt Liljas / David Whitall vs Randolph Court / Ce Charles Li3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Laukitis / Henry Forster vs Seth Yoskowitz / Ce Charles Li6-3, 6-2
2024-10-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesThomas Berray / David Whitall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Fall 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Luis Lozano
published
4.24
Barry Weiner
published 4.5
4.19
Richard Laukitis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.16
Brian Bichy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Luis Esposito
published
3.99
Derek Ireland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.94
Brent Kendall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.88
Thomas Berray
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Geoffrey Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.81
Bengt Liljas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
J Nathan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Joshua Folk
published
Daniel Lawson
published 4
3.70
Ryan Rohn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Henry Forster
published
3.60
David Whitall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
John Payne
published
Zaf Basha
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Bichy + Brent Kendall211154% games−1.0% vs expected
Bengt Liljas + Brent Kendall7652% games−14.1% vs expected
Geoffrey Montgomery + David Whitall5450% gamesnot enough data
Brian Bichy + David Whitall6259% gamesnot enough data
Geoffrey Montgomery + Bengt Liljas3447% gamesnot enough data
Geoffrey Montgomery + Brent Kendall3451% gamesnot enough data
Bengt Liljas + Brian Bichy2440% gamesnot enough data
Brent Kendall + David Whitall3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Lozano
67W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
4.39
4.5
Barry Weiner
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Richard Laukitis
167W–99L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Brian Bichy
170W–103L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Luis Esposito
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Derek Ireland
89W–146L career · 5 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Brent Kendall
184W–123L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Thomas Berray
80W–91L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.88
4
Geoffrey Montgomery
320W–242L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Bengt Liljas
128W–99L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
4
J Nathan
124W–108L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Joshua Folk
24W–25L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Daniel Lawson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Ryan Rohn
242W–218L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Henry Forster
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
David Whitall
78W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.60
John Payne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Zaf Basha
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.