Teams

Hotze, Eileen

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.60 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jenifer Muir
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.63
Angie Mcdermed
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.56
Trisha Jolliffe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Katie Trenkle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Madeline Moore
published
3.50
Katie Zoldak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Eileen Hotze
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Lori Blinn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Jessica Menghini
published
Betsy Graverson
published 3.5
3.22
Shauntae Morris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Hether Lytton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Natalie Hartman
published
3.14
Tasha Kosanke
published
3.13
Sheila Mccarrick
published
3.09
Melissa Beltrame
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Irene Caballero
published 3.5
Kim Wade
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Blinn + Natalie Hartman3349% games+15.9% vs expected
Betsy Graverson + Jenifer Muir4257% games+9.9% vs expected
Angie Mcdermed + Jenifer Muir251555% games+7.7% vs expected
Jessica Menghini + Katie Trenkle6750% games+6.0% vs expected
Eileen Hotze + Katie Trenkle13857% games+4.7% vs expected
Katie Trenkle + Jenifer Muir8753% games+4.4% vs expected
Lori Blinn + Trisha Jolliffe9949% games+4.0% vs expected
Angie Mcdermed + Lori Blinn111152% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenifer Muir
77W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Angie Mcdermed
119W–143L career · 6 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Trisha Jolliffe
55W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.56
Katie Trenkle
97W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Madeline Moore
5W–19L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Katie Zoldak
43W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Eileen Hotze
118W–104L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Lori Blinn
136W–190L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
Jessica Menghini
91W–70L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Betsy Graverson
34W–32L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shauntae Morris
49W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Hether Lytton
51W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Natalie Hartman
86W–70L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Tasha Kosanke
38W–46L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
Sheila Mccarrick
27W–31L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Melissa Beltrame
67W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Irene Caballero
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Kim Wade
86W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.