Teams

CK PURPLE

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-08vs BM YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Bebber / Sandy Reed vs Jane Carlson / Barbara Meyers6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRosemarie Kucharski / Theresa Murray vs Jean Dixon / Nathalia Faribault2-6, 0-6
2024-08-01vs ARCA GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Bebber / Sandy Reed vs Shelley Lopez / Joyce Penner6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Fuller / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Iris Shaw / Julee Powers6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRosemarie Kucharski / Theresa Murray vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-18vs CK REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Bebber / Sandy Reed vs Mary Barnett / Jennifer Harrop6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRosemarie Kucharski / Theresa Murray vs Barbara Chapman / Carole LaBounty1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-07-11vs PRKR YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesRosemarie Kucharski / Theresa Murray vs Toni Payne / Darlene Odean2-6, 2-6
2024-07-04vs LTC-D GREENSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKaren Bebber / Marlene Samokishyn vs Karen Schuster / Lynne McHugh6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Barnes / Rosemarie Kucharski vs Betsy Duryea / Terri Jenney7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-27vs HRCA-N REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Bebber / Sandy Reed vs Catherine Harju / Diane Matava6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Karen Bebber
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Margaret Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Rosemarie Kucharski
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Sandy Reed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Aura Leigh Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Judith Barnes
published
Marlene Samokishyn
published
Theresa Murray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Bebber + Sandy Reed10458% games+0.4% vs expected
Marlene Samokishyn + Aura Leigh Ferguson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Bebber
44W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
Margaret Fuller
25W–36L career · 1 line in 2024
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Rosemarie Kucharski
30W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Sandy Reed
40W–53L career · 1 line in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
2.5
Aura Leigh Ferguson
42W–67L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Judith Barnes
4W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marlene Samokishyn
12W–23L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Theresa Murray
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.