Teams

PLEASANTON 40AM3.5D

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-02-15vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesNimesh Gandhi / Melvin San Pedro vs Neerajkumar Chourasia / Raghupal Bejjanki4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-06vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesDan Helmer / Nimesh Gandhi vs Gautam Mylavarapu / Narayana Rao Surapaneni6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
David Lipnicke
published 4
3.58
Dan Helmer
published 3.5
3.54
Jeff Bennett
published
3.42
Jonathan Indick
published
3.38
Melvin San Pedro
published
3.36
Nimesh Gandhi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Ariel Santos
published 3.5
3.31
Andrey Izmaylov
published 3.5
3.30
Mark Vella
published 3.5
3.26
Jeff Gear
published
3.25
Edison Barco
published
3.23
Paul Purdy
published
3.17
Carlo Guariento
published 3.5
3.15
Sergio Castillo
published
3.11
Doug van Slyke
published
3.07
Kyle Jones
published
3.06
Lou Salvador
published
3.00
Rob Corder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ariel Santos + Jonathan Indick5162% games−2.6% vs expected
Mark Vella + Dan Helmer314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Lipnicke
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Dan Helmer
37W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
Jeff Bennett
16W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
Jonathan Indick
20W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Melvin San Pedro
22W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Nimesh Gandhi
147W–82L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Ariel Santos
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Andrey Izmaylov
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Mark Vella
31W–40L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
Jeff Gear
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
Edison Barco
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Paul Purdy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Carlo Guariento
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Sergio Castillo
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Doug van Slyke
8W–22L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Kyle Jones
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Lou Salvador
28W–22L career · no lines in 2023
34%65%<1%
3.06
Rob Corder
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.