← Teams

SAC-Lee

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Shannon Chen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.53
Laura Rundle
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.37
Kim Tellin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Chiharu Olsson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.21
Parul Saxena
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jill Boyce
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Patty Chen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Jinmi Kemple
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.84
Kusum Mehndiratta
published 3
Results8 ties
2023-06-18Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesAndrea Yao / Laura Rundle vs Renee Schwartz / Traci Laurent6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJill Boyce vs Nichole Anglin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJenna Dornblaser / Parul Saxena vs Chris Farentinos / Jenny Marston6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesWoohyung Kim / Patty Chen vs Kristin Butler / Laurie Sykes6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-11Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesJinmi Kemple vs Xia Yuan6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesParul Saxena / Kim Tellin vs Naun Yvonne Kim / Jing Li6-1, 6-1
2023-05-27Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesHeather Lee / Shannon Chen vs Renee Schwartz / Traci Laurent4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJill Boyce vs Nichole Anglin6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Elmer / Chiharu Olsson vs Chris Farentinos / Kelly Norling4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Tellin / Parul Saxena vs Blythe Knott / Kristin Butler6-1, 6-4
2023-05-20Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLaura Rundle / Shannon Chen vs Miriam Habafy / Kim Boston2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJill Boyce vs Angie Gordon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJinmi Kemple / Jenna Dornblaser vs Sarah Mutal / Annette Hill6-4, 6-2
2023-05-06Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesShannon Chen / Heather Lee vs Caroline Popma / Marcy Bernhardt3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChiharu Olsson vs Jen Lawrence6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPatty Chen / Woohyung Kim vs Susan Torch / Rebecca McMasters6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKim Tellin / Jenna Dornblaser vs Julie Kim / Alexandra Lee4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-29Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAndrea Yao / Shannon Chen vs Astrid Andreu / Karen Harlow6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJinmi Kemple / Woohyung Kim vs Amanda Lowthian / Sheila Schmidt7-6, 6-4
2023-04-22Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesAndrea Yao / Laura Rundle vs TERESA LAWHEAD / Della Shanley6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShannon Chen vs Jessica Meyer3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSabine Verbiest / Jill Boyce vs Kristin Campbell / Sharr Stark6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesChiharu Olsson / Susan Elmer vs Mia Birk / Wendy Hill6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAndrea Yao / Laura Rundle vs Tina Clancy / Dayna Porter7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesShannon Chen vs Jannell Cuddy6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPatty Chen / Woohyung Kim vs Rochelle Pluymers / Rebecca Griffith6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Shannon Chen
67W–32L career
0%98%2%
3.84
4
Laura Rundle
113W–113L career
25%75%0%
3.53
3.5
Kim Tellin
110W–71L career
0%97%2%
3.37
3.5
Chiharu Olsson
48W–47L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Parul Saxena
36W–43L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Jill Boyce
148W–90L career
3%97%0%
3.19
3.5
Patty Chen
59W–56L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3
Jinmi Kemple
75W–78L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Kusum Mehndiratta
20W–14L career
1%94%5%
2.84

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.