Teams

CALM

2025 FLEX DYNAMIC DUO · Women 3.5

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-09-29vs Girl PowerWon 10
W#1 SinglesLindsey Cassidy vs Christeena Sevy7-5
2025-09-20vs Treasure Volley GirlsWon 10
W#2 SinglesMolly Otter vs Alexandra Geffon6-4
2025-09-19vs Girl PowerWon 10
W#2 SinglesMolly Otter vs Donna Moussalli6-3
2025-09-14vs Lashes & SmashesWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsey Cassidy vs Christy Siemons6-1
W#2 SinglesAndrea Reynolds vs Erin Kohler6-4
2025-09-07vs Treasure Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 SinglesAndrea Reynolds vs Madison Vilay6-1
2025-09-03vs Treasure Volley GirlsWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsey Cassidy vs Madison Vilay6-1
W#2 SinglesMolly Otter vs Alexandra Geffon6-1
2025-08-30vs Lashes & SmashesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAndrea Reynolds vs Rachel Boren6-2
L#2 SinglesLindsey Cassidy vs Christy Siemons4-6
2025-08-23vs Lashes & SmashesWon 20
W#1 SinglesMolly Otter vs Rachel Boren6-2
W#2 SinglesAndrea Reynolds vs Christy Siemons6-2
2025-08-20vs Girl PowerWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsey Cassidy vs Rebecca Clift-French6-3
W#2 SinglesMolly Otter vs Kim Buchanan6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CALM81216684
2Lashes & Smashes721988102
3Girl Power2781919130
4Treasure Volley Girls1862121152

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Caitlin Bower
published 3.5
3.38
Molly Otter
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Lindsey Cassidy
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Reynolds
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caitlin Bower + Lindsey Cassidy404 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Cassidy + Molly Otter224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caitlin Bower
50W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Molly Otter
133W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Lindsey Cassidy
111W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Andrea Reynolds
84W–122L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.