Teams

Have A Slice Day

2025 Montgomery Doubles Winter Women · Montgomery Doubles Winter 3.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-31vs The PlayersLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeanne Cordisco / Tamara Kucik vs Susan Baker / Cynthia Mariz4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSally Gaines / Beth Sodie vs Kamlesh Dhallan / Elizabeth Wenzel6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEmma Wells / Elizabeth Overmann vs Tracy Koretsky / Sheila Maloney6-4, 6-4
2025-03-25vs Brown - Congressional 3.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesBarbara Braffett / Ingrid Martin vs Skye Replogle / Samantha Brown4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHelen Chao / Saira Malik vs Renata Raeder / Amrita Rai6-4, 6-2
2025-03-07vs Wager-Congressional 3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJeanne Cordisco / Jennifer Bergeron vs Alison Wager / Meaghan LeNard6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSaira Malik / Margo Herron vs Christine O'connell / Chais Ondeck6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNina Aicardi / Tonya Esposito vs Emily Warke / Suzanne Kimpel1-6, 2-6
2025-03-03vs Manor 3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Sodie / Tamara Kucik vs Abbie Brady / Laura Davis1-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesJeanne Cordisco / Elizabeth Overmann vs KAREN WALKER / Veronica Vannoy6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTonya Esposito / Saira Malik vs Marilyn Mess / Mary Lou Goehrung6-2, 6-0
2025-02-20vs Brown - Congressional 3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTamara Kucik / Beth Sodie vs Skye Replogle / Carolyn Ruyak2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTonya Esposito / Katey Nalls vs Carina Bartozzi / Samantha Brown1-6, 2-6
2025-02-14vs The PlayersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeanne Cordisco / Margaret Cornelius vs Cynthia Mariz / Sheila Maloney3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNina Aicardi / Melissa Ingber vs Kamlesh Dhallan / Ursula Iannone3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTamara Kucik / Tonya Esposito vs Sanam Boroumand / Debi Palmer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-01-30vs Wager-Congressional 3.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesNina Aicardi / Barbara Braffett vs Meaghan LeNard / Alison Wager7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret Cornelius / Elizabeth Overmann vs Chais Ondeck / Emily Warke6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIngrid Martin / Jennifer Bergeron vs Stephanie van Pelt / Ketrina Sharp6-1, 6-1
2025-01-24vs Manor 3.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesBarbara Braffett / Katey Nalls vs Grace Coleman / Laura Davis3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Ingber / Nina Aicardi vs Kathryn Lloyd / Julie Georgelakos6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHelen Chao / Tonya Esposito vs Mary Lou Goehrung / Veronica Vannoy6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Winter 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Jennifer Bergeron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Margo Herron
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Emma Wells
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Margaret Cornelius
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Ingrid Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Saira Malik
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Barbara Braffett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Beth Sodie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elizabeth Overmann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Katey Nalls
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Helen Chao
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Tonya Esposito
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Nina Aicardi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jeanne Cordisco
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Melissa Ingber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sally Gaines
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tamara Kucik
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Cornelius + Elizabeth Overmann5163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Bergeron
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.22
Margo Herron
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Emma Wells
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Margaret Cornelius
14W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Ingrid Martin
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Saira Malik
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Barbara Braffett
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Beth Sodie
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Overmann
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katey Nalls
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Helen Chao
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
Tonya Esposito
12W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Nina Aicardi
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Jeanne Cordisco
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Ingber
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Gaines
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tamara Kucik
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.