Teams

Arbor View - Harrison

Cherokee Fall ('25) - Southern Combo 18 & Over · Women Combo 8.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-22vs Cherokee/Laurie SchmidtLost 12
L#1 DoublesChinny Law / Emma Ku vs Michelle Edler / Kathy von Broembsen3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusie Ivy / Kimberly Sperling vs Forrest Bohannon / Jennifer Beebe6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDanielle Smith / Shinobu Koizumi Fawcett vs Christine Michaels / Laurie Schmidt6-1, 6-4
2025-09-15vs Cherokee/Laurie SchmidtLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmma Ku / Chinny Law vs Forrest Bohannon / Alisa Price4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany Simpson / Kimberly Sperling vs Michelle Edler / Kathy von Broembsen7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesShinobu Koizumi Fawcett / Danielle Smith vs Jennifer Beebe / Kay Moody6-7, 3-6
2025-09-08vs Cherokee/Laurie SchmidtLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusie Ivy / Kimberly Sperling vs Forrest Bohannon / Alisa Price3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Keel / Shinobu Koizumi Fawcett vs Kay Moody / Heather Robinson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTiffany Simpson / Erin Harrison vs Christine Michaels / Laurie Schmidt6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Combo 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Shinobu Koizumi Fawcett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.37
Kimberly Sperling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.33
Emma Ku
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Erin Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Tiffany Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Susie Ivy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Chinny Law
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Teresa Keel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Harrison + Kimberly Sperling7162% games+10.5% vs expected
Chinny Law + Teresa Keel3251% games+1.9% vs expected
Emma Ku + Erin Harrison1637% games−8.7% vs expected
Susie Ivy + Tiffany Simpson123 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Sperling + Shinobu Koizumi Fawcett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shinobu Koizumi Fawcett
32W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.52
Kimberly Sperling
28W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
4.37
4.5
Emma Ku
42W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Erin Harrison
62W–62L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Tiffany Simpson
53W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Susie Ivy
33W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Chinny Law
19W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.67
Teresa Keel
45W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.