Teams

Western: Go

2022 40&Over Women · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-30vs McDermottWon 31
W#1 DoublesCarol Eisenman / Julie Goldblatt vs Brenda Harvey / Laraine Segar6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesVictoria Briggs vs Sara Miller1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTricia Rupright / Alinda Drury vs Joanne Parkes / Fauna Pappalardo-Minges3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Pierce-Morey / Kathleen Savage vs Lori Green / Kimberly Patterson6-4, 6-1
2022-06-28vs McDermottWon 31
W#1 DoublesDebra Go / Mary-Beth Rumble vs Brenda Harvey / Lori Green6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKristi Seaver vs Laraine Segar7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesArlene Monte / Judy Allen vs Alison Jameson / Joanne Parkes6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Savage / Carol Eisenman vs Sara Miller / Kimberly Patterson6-0, 6-4
2022-06-23vs McDermottSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDebra Go / Carol Eisenman vs Beth McDermott / Laura Benotti5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulie Goldblatt vs Sara Miller2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Burton / Arlene Monte vs Brenda Harvey / Joanne Parkes4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLynn Pierce-Morey / Victoria Briggs vs Kimberly Patterson / Alison Jameson6-2, 6-1
2022-06-16vs McDermottWon 31
W#1 DoublesDebra Go / Mary-Beth Rumble vs Brenda Harvey / Laura Benotti5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristi Seaver vs Sara Miller3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJudy Allen / Tricia Rupright vs Laraine Segar / Heidi Fjermedal6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCaroline Burton / Elizabeth Berry vs Martha Kohn / Lori Green6-2, 6-2
2022-06-09vs McDermottSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKristi Seaver / Tricia Rupright vs Beth McDermott / Laraine Segar6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVictoria Briggs vs Sara Miller4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesArlene Monte / Alinda Drury vs Joanne Parkes / Alison Jameson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCaroline Burton / Elizabeth Berry vs Fauna Pappalardo-Minges / Kimberly Patterson6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Go0513719167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Tricia Rupright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Julie Goldblatt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Kathleen Savage
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Mary-Beth Rumble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Debra Go
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Arlene Monte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Caroline Burton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Alinda Drury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Berry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Judy Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Carol Eisenman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Kristi Seaver
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Lynn Pierce-Morey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Victoria Briggs
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Go + Mary-Beth Rumble4161% games+9.3% vs expected
Julie Goldblatt + Carol Eisenman5164% games+9.0% vs expected
Julie Goldblatt + Judy Allen5258% games+5.4% vs expected
Kathleen Savage + Carol Eisenman6162% games+5.3% vs expected
Mary-Beth Rumble + Caroline Burton5256% games+4.5% vs expected
Kristi Seaver + Mary-Beth Rumble3349% games+3.3% vs expected
Debra Go + Julie Goldblatt5552% games+2.8% vs expected
Judy Allen + Tricia Rupright10855% games+2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tricia Rupright
106W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Julie Goldblatt
74W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Kathleen Savage
101W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Mary-Beth Rumble
127W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Debra Go
147W–99L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Arlene Monte
47W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Caroline Burton
85W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alinda Drury
18W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Berry
24W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Judy Allen
116W–107L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Carol Eisenman
114W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Kristi Seaver
101W–161L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Lynn Pierce-Morey
42W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Victoria Briggs
31W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.