← Teams

THPRD-Wu

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Denielle Edlund
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Carol Woolman
published 4.5
4.11
Sue Gregoire
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.92
Xia Wu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
published 4.5
3.87
Michael Sather
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.84
Claire Thayer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Jill Sather
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Carrie Putsch
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
—
Takumi Koyama
published 0
Results8 ties
2023-03-12Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesJim Rankin / Xia Wu vs Stephanie Paulson / Josh Schweitz6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Sather / Sue Gregoire vs Jerilyn Hanson / Carl Swanson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-12Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJesus Javier Ruiz Rojas / Denielle Edlund vs Butch Dela Cruz / Kirsten Ruchaber6-1, 6-0
2023-02-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJesus Javier Ruiz Rojas / Carrie Putsch vs Matthew Condit / Susan Ford6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Sather / Sue Gregoire vs Kevin Muck / Cindy Rushall6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJim Rankin / Xia Wu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-05Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesMichael Sather / Carrie Putsch vs Lisa Klein / Jeroen Swanborn6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJustin Carrier / Denielle Edlund vs Linda Anderson / Steve Fogg7-5, 6-0
2023-02-04Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesJesus Javier Ruiz Rojas / Carrie Putsch vs Heidi Affentranger / Frank Collie6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJill Sather / Michael Sather vs Jennifer Larsen / Chris Collins6-4, 6-0
2023-01-28Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJustin Carrier / Denielle Edlund vs Brent Waddle / Krista Mikalatos6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari / Sue Gregoire vs Mike Mon / Emi Tsumura6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Sather / Jill Sather vs Todd Kuribayashi / Tami Oglesby6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-21Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesClaire Thayer / Justin Carrier vs David Finkelman / Noriko Satake6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Sather / Denielle Edlund vs Jeb Hubbs / Deborah Naugler6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSue Gregoire / Renato Bernasconi Zuccari vs James Graber / Bo Yu6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesXia Wu / Jim Rankin vs Seiji Okumura / Sydney Taggart7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Sather / Jill Sather vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Denielle Edlund
66W–25L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Carol Woolman
31W–13L career · type S
1%96%3%
4.23
4.5
Sue Gregoire
120W–80L career
3%97%0%
4.11
4.5
Xia Wu
54W–79L career · type A
33%67%0%
3.92
4.5
Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
62W–56L career
33%67%0%
3.92
4.5
Michael Sather
43W–69L career
48%52%0%
3.87
4
Claire Thayer
136W–67L career
0%98%2%
3.84
4
Jill Sather
45W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Carrie Putsch
62W–49L career
2%98%0%
3.73
0
Takumi Koyama
47W–24L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.