Teams

Yadkin/Wright/18 8.5

2026 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Men 8.5 - Monday Nights

12 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-17vs Yadkin/Guevel-Ballard/18+8.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesAeimit Lakdawala / Paul Daggs vs Barrett Self / Aaron Antreassian6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesConner McGowan / Mark Yamane vs Tate Johnson / Alex George6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTK Vacharee / Jonathan Chandler vs Aidan Ballard / Connor Ballard2-6, 4-6
2026-08-10vs Yadkin/Old Town/18+8.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesConner McGowan / Matthew Wright vs Daniel Allen / Robin Lucas2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAeimit Lakdawala / Will Jordan-Leonard vs David Broughton / John Munroe6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAdam Montessi / Brian Paley vs Drew Plonk / Chip Campbell6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 - Monday Nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Paley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
TK Vacharee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Mark Yamane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.14
Michael Auger
published
4.03
Adam Montessi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.98
Conner McGowan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.93
Matthew Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Paul Daggs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Aeimit Lakdawala
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Will Jordan-Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
3.70
Jonathan Chandler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Davis Phanthalack + Jonathan Chandler4158% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Wright + Will Jordan-Leonard4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Paley
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
TK Vacharee
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Mark Yamane
17W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
4.16
Michael Auger
9W–4L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
4.14
4
Adam Montessi
124W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.03
4.5
Conner McGowan
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
Matthew Wright
30W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.93
Paul Daggs
12W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Aeimit Lakdawala
13W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.92
Will Jordan-Leonard
19W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Davis Phanthalack
32W–19L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Jonathan Chandler
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.