Teams

TLTC-Philbrick (4.0)

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Alana Wade
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.61
Krista Philbrick
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.56
Tenley Cederstrand
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Results6 ties
2021-07-10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKrista Philbrick / Alana Wade vs Jennifer Kohler / Molly Hunter6-4, 6-0
2021-06-20Split 11
L#2 SinglesAlana Wade vs Lisa Kim6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTenley Cederstrand / Krista Philbrick vs Dana Johnston / Anneke Berry6-1, 6-2
2021-06-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTenley Cederstrand / Kristin Gallagher vs Tracey Hoy / Louise Doran6-4, 6-3
2021-06-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesAlana Wade vs Ellen Gallinatti7-5, 6-3
2021-05-22Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKristin Gallagher / Tenley Cederstrand vs Tanya Bond / Molly Good6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKrista Philbrick / Kim Wilson vs Stacey Nelson / Michelle O'Neil6-2, 6-4
2021-05-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKrista Philbrick / Kristy Braunston vs Molly Hunter / Jennifer Kohler6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Alana Wade
22W–29L career
36%64%0%
3.91
4
Krista Philbrick
144W–86L career
9%91%0%
3.61
4
Tenley Cederstrand
30W–71L career
17%83%0%
3.56

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.