Teams

Haynes-Mitchell/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/POTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Tri-Level 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Shrev

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-04vs Gonzalez/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/BTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesMeghan Slusher / Katherine Roberts vs Amanda Hooper / Heather Pearson6-4, 6-1
2026-07-28vs Douglas-Bunyard/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/BTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesValerie DeLatte / MLiss Sella vs Jenny Rodgers / Aubree Bunyard7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNikki Hanna / Katherine Adams vs Meredith Graf / Morgan Goodwin1-6, 3-6
2026-07-21vs Bush/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/QTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMLiss Sella / Valerie DeLatte vs Kaeiron Saunders / Brianna Gordon6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Drummond / Katherine Adams vs Carmen Schaumburg / Heidi Wimberly6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMeghan Slusher / Nikki Hanna vs Jennifer Beruvides / Kate Patty6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-30vs Griffin-Dunn/18/TWN/2.5-3-3.5/QTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatherine Roberts / Meghan Slusher vs Liz Navarre / Lauren Price6-2, 6-3
2026-06-23vs Thiels/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/BTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Drummond / Nikki Hanna vs Christine Mcwilliams / Meghan Brown4-6, 2-6
2026-06-16vs Hand/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/CTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesMeghan Slusher / Katherine Adams vs Susan English / Amy Phipps7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Thiels/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/BTC8019518202
2Douglas-Bunyard/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/BTC6216817173
3Haynes-Mitchell/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/POTC5317718179
4Griffin-Dunn/18/TWN/2.5-3-3.5/QTC44131126213
5Hand/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/CTC44121226209
6Watters/18.5/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/POTC44121230225
7Matheny/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/STCC44101430226
8Bush/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/QTC2681635250
9Gonzalez/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/BTC2661839251
10Gifford-Cooper/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/STCC1771737254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Emily Overdyke
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Karen McCoy
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.22
Kim McGuirt
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.17
Kimberly Arizmendi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Caroline Landon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Shayne Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Caroline Jeter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
MLiss Sella
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Lynette Campisi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.97
Mary-Frances Haynes
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.95
Valerie DeLatte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Katie Comeaux
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Lindsey Cotton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Brittany Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Meghan Slusher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Katherine Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Nikki Hanna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen McCoy + Kimberly Arizmendi10656% games+13.5% vs expected
Brittany Mitchell + Mary-Frances Haynes11069% games+12.3% vs expected
MLiss Sella + Lynette Campisi7265% games+10.1% vs expected
Lindsey Cotton + MLiss Sella4260% games+9.8% vs expected
Kimberly Arizmendi + Lynette Campisi10558% games+9.3% vs expected
Brittany Mitchell + Shayne Bryan5654% games+6.2% vs expected
Mary-Frances Haynes + Lynette Campisi9259% games+4.2% vs expected
MLiss Sella + Shayne Bryan6355% games+4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Overdyke
52W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Karen McCoy
51W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
Kim McGuirt
39W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
Kimberly Arizmendi
54W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Caroline Landon
36W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Shayne Bryan
32W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Caroline Jeter
34W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
MLiss Sella
81W–64L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Lynette Campisi
67W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.98
Mary-Frances Haynes
60W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Valerie DeLatte
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95
Katie Comeaux
35W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lindsey Cotton
44W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Brittany Mitchell
51W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
Meghan Slusher
37W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%18%82%
2.62
Katherine Adams
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
Nikki Hanna
11W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.