Teams

MCTA55/Haviland/RHTC

Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult Women - 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-25vs MCTA 3.0W 55 & Over (Ceran)Split 11
W#1 DoublesNicole Morgan / Debbie Hayworth vs Karen Davies / Katherine Hargett6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Garland / Joanne Ward vs Yvonne Ceran / Kim Thomas2-6, 2-6
2026-03-18vs MCTA 3.0W 55 & Over (Ceran)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Haviland / Julie Richardson vs Karen Davies / Lisa Wright1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLizette Conover / Karen Garland vs Dawn Houpt / Liesl Graf6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTerri Hansford / Joanne Ward vs Kathy Hoffman / Yvonne Ceran2-6, 1-6
2026-03-11vs MCTA 3.0W 55 & Over (Ceran)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesNicole Morgan / Lizette Conover vs Victoria Sofarelli / Liesl Graf7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Haviland / Laura Hatfield vs Karen Davies / Yvonne Ceran3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Garland / Terri Hansford vs Kathy Hoffman / Joanne James2-6, 1-6
2026-03-04vs MCTA 3.0W 55 & Over (Ceran)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Haviland / Nicole Morgan vs Lisa Wright / Yvonne Ceran3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Hatfield / Debbie Hayworth vs Kathy Hoffman / Joanne James7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLizette Conover / Joanne Ward vs Katherine Hargett / Karen Davies1-6, 3-6
2026-02-25vs MCTA 3.0W 55 & Over (Ceran)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Hayworth / Terri Hansford vs Yvonne Ceran / Kim Thomas1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Richardson / Nicole Morgan vs Karen Davies / Victoria Sofarelli4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarrie Letorney / Debby Bosselman vs Liesl Graf / Katherine Hargett0-6, 3-6
2026-02-18vs MCTA 3.0W 55 & Over (Ceran)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarrie Letorney / Nicole Morgan vs Lisa Wright / Victoria Sofarelli2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Martin / Julie Richardson vs Yvonne Ceran / Kim Thomas2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Hatfield / Joanne Ward vs Katherine Hargett / Karen Davies2-6, 0-6
2026-02-11vs MCTA 3.0W 55 & Over (Ceran)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRenee Martin / Julie Richardson vs Karen Davies / Victoria Sofarelli5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Haviland / Nicole Morgan vs Yvonne Ceran / Kim Thomas1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLizette Conover / Joanne Ward vs Kathy Hoffman / Dawn Houpt6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Adult Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCTA 3.0W 55 & Over (Ceran)701839124
2MCTA55/Haviland/RHTC0731837239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Lizette Conover
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.97
Nicole Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Debby Bosselman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Susan Haviland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Julie Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Laura Hatfield
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Joanne Ward
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.54
Terri Hansford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Carrie Letorney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.47
Karen Garland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Hansford + Joanne Ward033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lizette Conover
53W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Nicole Morgan
15W–39L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Debby Bosselman
18W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Susan Haviland
17W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Julie Richardson
13W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.64
Laura Hatfield
22W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Joanne Ward
4W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
Terri Hansford
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Carrie Letorney
15W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Karen Garland
12W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.