Teams

BC-MCC/BlairO'Brien

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Katie Ball
published
3.27
Betsey Clements
published 3.5
3.25
Racquel Armandpour
published
3.21
Kim Solomon
published
3.19
Janna Hahn
published
3.14
Juli Kanner
published
3.07
Lesley Merlo
published
3.07
Shelly Malone
published
2.93
Serena Scott
published
2.85
Kathleen Stephens
published
2.83
Ashley Goldsmith
published 3
2.79
Nicole Pacourek
published
2.77
Alicia Greene
published 3
2.54
Elizabeth Mann
published 3
Lillian Bohannon
published
Sonia Simms
published
Tanya Perlmutter
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Ball
23W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Betsey Clements
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Racquel Armandpour
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Kim Solomon
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Janna Hahn
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Juli Kanner
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.14
Lesley Merlo
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
Shelly Malone
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
Serena Scott
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%0%
2.93
Kathleen Stephens
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Ashley Goldsmith
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
Nicole Pacourek
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Alicia Greene
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Elizabeth Mann
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.54
Lillian Bohannon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sonia Simms
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tanya Perlmutter
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.