Teams

Landis/Shaver/LR/Rebsamen

2026 Combo 40 & Over 5.5, 7.5 · 7.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-30vs Pinter/LR/BPWon 20
W#1 DoublesKevin Luneau / Jason Bennett vs Jesse Converse / Michael Castens6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesWill Aguilar / Gerald New vs Landon Davis / Pablo Sanchez Soria6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Landis/Shaver/LR/Rebsamen000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Kevin Luneau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Gerald New
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Lanny Landis
published
3.49
Jason Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Wade Anderson
published
James Bryant
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Bennett + Gerald New7168% games+14.9% vs expected
Wade Anderson + Gerald New7358% games+8.5% vs expected
Wade Anderson + Jason Bennett314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Luneau
37W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Gerald New
50W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
Lanny Landis
26W–22L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
Jason Bennett
52W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Wade Anderson
28W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
James Bryant
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.