Teams

PTA Dream Team

Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALLEGHENY MNTN.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-09vs Mt Lebanon No DramaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMansi David / Annette Seelhorst vs Ashleigh Clark / Amanda Harris3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 Singlespoornima krishnamurthy vs Amelia Dyke1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-26vs Mt Lebanon No DramaWon 41
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Washington de Souza / Lauren Oeler vs Stacey Franklin / Lisa McGuigan5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGrace Cameron vs Kathy Guajardo3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Klesic / Donna Courtney vs Gwendolen Drahnak / Kaitlin Metz6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnnette Seelhorst vs Amelia Dyke6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Kelley / Tiffany Pellathy vs Eileen Ford / Debra Frank6-2, 6-4
2026-07-19vs Pittsburgh SmashSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKristine Santerini / Janet Klesic vs Megan Pearlman / Jennifer Kelly1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKe Li / poornima krishnamurthy vs Julie Goetz / Maripat Rafferty4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJanell Baden vs Sara Coax1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTiffany Pellathy / Mansi David vs Carol Lang / Marilyn Stack6-4, 6-4
2026-07-12vs 40 LovesLost 14
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Rounding / Kristine Santerini vs Christine Ardolino / Julie Joseph3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGrace Cameron vs Jane Robertson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMansi David / Kathy Daschbach vs Beverly Pietrandrea / Jennifer Zofchak4-6, 1-5
L#2 Singlespoornima krishnamurthy vs Kimberley Baker3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKatelyn Diehl / Donna Courtney vs Sandy Rodeheaver / Ruth Rush6-1, 6-4
2026-06-28vs Pittsburgh SmashLost 23
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Washington de Souza / Elizabeth Rounding vs Qifan He / Sarah Mayer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 Singlespoornima krishnamurthy vs Jennifer Kelly0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Klesic / Kathy Daschbach vs Jessica Christie / Beverly Varnay6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJanell Baden vs Megan Pearlman0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKatelyn Diehl / Joanna Fisher vs Laura DeCastro / Carol Lang6-2, 6-2
2026-06-14vs 40 LovesLost 14
L#1 DoublesRonni Pelle / Mansi David vs Christine Ardolino / Naoko Sakoda2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJanell Baden vs Julia McDaniel1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Kelley / Annette Seelhorst vs Carolyn Buongiorno / Ruth Rush6-7, 1-6
W#2 Singlespoornima krishnamurthy vs Sandy Rodeheaver5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatelyn Diehl / Ke Li vs CAROL ARNOLD / Lisa Carryer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-07vs Pittsburgh SmashSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKristine Santerini / Ronni Pelle vs Julie Goetz / Sarah Mayer1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJanell Baden vs Qing Deng0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Klesic / Joanna Fisher vs Sarah Larkin / Marilyn Stack6-4, 6-3
W#3 Doublespoornima krishnamurthy / Annette Seelhorst vs Beverly Varnay / Gaylen Westfall4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-31vs Mt Lebanon No DramaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMansi David / Kathy Daschbach vs Katie Sharon / Jessica Liao2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesGrace Cameron vs Kathy Guajardo3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Oeler / Elizabeth Rounding vs Amelia Dyke / Elizabeth Franco6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKristine Santerini / Donna Courtney vs Karen Krieger / Clara Phelps6-4, 6-4
2026-05-17vs 40 LovesLost 14
L#1 DoublesKristine Santerini / Elizabeth Washington de Souza vs Julie Joseph / Christine Ardolino6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGrace Cameron vs Hannah Rauh4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTiffany Pellathy / Kate Sheehan vs Beverly Pietrandrea / Kimberley Baker3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJanell Baden vs Julia McDaniel3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnnette Seelhorst / Stephanie Kelley vs Emily Carson / Dana Tinkey6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pittsburgh Smash09281738304
240 Loves09281740349
3Mt Lebanon No Drama09172859424
4PTA Dream Team09172863447

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Ronni Pelle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Tiffany Pellathy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Stephanie Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Donna Courtney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Kate Sheehan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Katelyn Diehl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Lauren Oeler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Grace Cameron
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Kristine Santerini
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.72
Janet Klesic
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
poornima krishnamurthy
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.70
Kathy Daschbach
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Elizabeth Washington de Souza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Mansi David
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.61
Annette Seelhorst
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
Elizabeth Rounding
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Janell Baden
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Joanna Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ke Li
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mansi David + Kathy Daschbach134 matchesnot enough data
Ke Li + Katelyn Diehl033 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Pellathy + Kate Sheehan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ronni Pelle
32W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Tiffany Pellathy
18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
Stephanie Kelley
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Donna Courtney
3W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Kate Sheehan
14W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Katelyn Diehl
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
Lauren Oeler
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Grace Cameron
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Kristine Santerini
27W–77L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Janet Klesic
36W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
poornima krishnamurthy
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Kathy Daschbach
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Elizabeth Washington de Souza
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Mansi David
11W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63
3
Annette Seelhorst
15W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Elizabeth Rounding
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Janell Baden
0W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Joanna Fisher
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ke Li
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.