Teams

3.0 RMC DesertReign W18S

2024 SPRING Adult 18 & Over - CAZ · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-08vs 3.0 OCO Village Vixens W18SWon 32
L#1 DoublesSonia Natividad / Karin Smith vs Connie Rosenberger / Michelle Stowers4-6, 3-5
W#1 SinglesSarah Sudduth vs Diana LeDonne4-6, 4-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSophia Harder / Lysa Clemens vs Erika Mitsuyuki / Lisa Schwab3-6, 3-5
W#2 SinglesAnna-Kate Bultema vs Stephanie McLeod6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJessica McGinnis / Nakia Neves vs Luz Aldama / Kelly Woods6-0, 6-0
2024-03-11vs 3.0 STRC WildWestValley W18SLost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberly Grandy Sember / Sonia Natividad vs Moyra Steele / Kristina Gibson0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Sudduth vs Denise Durkin6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLysa Clemens / Sophia Harder vs Nicole Heath / Nicole Rosales6-7, 2-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Myers / Laura Packard vs Samantha Bradford / Niccol Walsh2-6, 3-6
2024-03-04vs Spring 3.0 PTC Heat Strokes W18SLost 03
L#1 DoublesSophia Harder / Lysa Clemens vs Julie Aguilar / Kaili Fuller0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Grandy Sember / Sonia Natividad vs Courtney Skvarla / Christie Lukes3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulie A Tieder / Nakia Neves vs Rhonda Campbell / Alicia Ryan3-6, 2-6
2024-02-12vs 3.0 OCO Village Vixens W18SWon 32
L#1 DoublesLysa Clemens / Kimberly Grandy Sember vs Ruth Chau-Bergloff / Connie Rosenberger3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Sudduth vs Diana LeDonne6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTerri Lundak / Jessica McGinnis vs Tanya Corder / Amanda Breuer4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesSophia Harder vs Karen Quick6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNakia Neves / Jade Nguyen vs Erika Mitsuyuki / Norma Geier6-1, 6-2
2024-01-08vs 3.0 STRC WildWestValley W18SLost 05
L#1 DoublesSophia Harder / Kimberly Grandy Sember vs Moyra Steele / Kristina Gibson1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Sudduth vs Lesley Bernal1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJessica McGinnis / Lysa Clemens vs Pat Cleveland / Samantha Bradford3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLaura Packard vs Winnie Joy Bareng1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJade Nguyen / Nakia Neves vs Nicole Heath / Angela Rabb0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Sarah Sudduth
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.01
Michelle Bohn
published
2.94
Anna-Kate Bultema
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.90
Julie A Tieder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Sonia Natividad
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.71
Terri Lundak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Nakia Neves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Kimberly Grandy Sember
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.58
Melissa Losasso
published
2.49
Jade Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Laura Packard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.45
Sophia Harder
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.24
Beth Schryer
published 3
Karin Smith
published
Lysa Clemens
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Megan Myers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Grandy Sember + Karin Smith6263% games+7.0% vs expected
Kimberly Grandy Sember + Julie A Tieder7656% games+6.9% vs expected
Kimberly Grandy Sember + Michelle Bohn4451% games+1.3% vs expected
Beth Schryer + Melissa Losasso1642% games−0.2% vs expected
Lysa Clemens + Sophia Harder1638% games−3.1% vs expected
Kimberly Grandy Sember + Beth Schryer2541% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Grandy Sember + Laura Packard134 matchesnot enough data
Beth Schryer + Megan Myers224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Sudduth
47W–54L career · 9 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Michelle Bohn
43W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Anna-Kate Bultema
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Julie A Tieder
33W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
Sonia Natividad
39W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.73
Terri Lundak
12W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Nakia Neves
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
Kimberly Grandy Sember
87W–110L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
Melissa Losasso
23W–48L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
2.58
Jade Nguyen
28W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49
Laura Packard
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.47
Sophia Harder
7W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.45
3
Beth Schryer
28W–49L career · type A · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.24
Karin Smith
17W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lysa Clemens
24W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Myers
19W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.