Teams

CBRC - Curry

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 2.86 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-29vs EW-CBRC-MehlenbacherLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarlos Peredo / Lory Allen vs Larry Bagaasen / Huijuan Zhang3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBarry Vedder / Amy Hoins vs James Chandler / Candee Foss2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSittilerk Trikalsaransukh / Heidi Bucheli vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Sheila Coles5-7, 6-7
2025-06-28vs EW-WRAC-van HoutenLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Allen / Carol Curry vs Ricardo Diaz Carcamo / Donna Roberts4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarlos Peredo / Heidi Bucheli vs Marcelo Toledo / Bo Xiao1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBarry Vedder / Amy Hoins vs Mark Miller / Kathleen McIver4-6, 2-6
2025-06-28vs WRAC - LorrainLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Curry / Carlos Peredo vs Corinne Choy / Daniel Kranz6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Bucheli / Sittilerk Trikalsaransukh vs Steve Wolcott / Cindy Bowen-Lorrain0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLory Allen / Stephen Allen vs Emily Lesky / Michael Daines6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-WRAC-van Houten3090561
2WRAC - Lorrain12361487
3CBRC - Curry031816105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Stephen Allen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Carol Curry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Barry Vedder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Lory Allen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Heidi Bucheli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Amy Hoins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Carlos Peredo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Sittilerk Trikalsaransukh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lory Allen + Stephen Allen61042% games−6.8% vs expected
Carlos Peredo + Carol Curry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Stephen Allen
42W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Carol Curry
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Barry Vedder
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Lory Allen
23W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Heidi Bucheli
6W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Amy Hoins
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Carlos Peredo
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sittilerk Trikalsaransukh
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.