Teams

RCC GREEN

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-08vs BCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Braun / Christina Sjolin vs Merry Todd / Nadine Rich6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKaren Stuckemeyer vs Lisabeth Warshafsky6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-08-25vs NJ NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesRhonda Plambeck / Morgan Ernzen vs Karen Stanley / Kristina Klug6-2, 6-1
2022-08-18vs TTA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesRhonda Plambeck / Morgan Ernzen vs Viji Duncan / Jessica Marten6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChristina Sjolin vs Tanya Jones6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Stuckemeyer / Carolyn Braun vs Diane Howes / Cynthia Davis6-1, 6-3
2022-08-11vs RCC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRhonda Plambeck / Morgan Ernzen vs Chrissy Hasek / Emily Miller6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTammy Galloway / Christina Sjolin vs Naomi Gaeng / Tayrien Holocher1-6, 3-6
2022-08-04vs NJ PINKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Stuckemeyer / Morgan Ernzen vs Michelle Brown / Paige Brennan4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristina Sjolin / Tammy Galloway vs Maggie Gomer / Janine Kehlenbach7-5, 6-3
2022-07-28vs CVTA REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Plambeck / Morgan Ernzen vs Julie Clement / Joni Roberts6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKaren Stuckemeyer vs Christina Davies4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Sjolin / Tammy Galloway vs Natalie Richardson / Melanie Abel6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Morgan Ernzen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Carolyn Braun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Christina Sjolin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.16
Karen Stuckemeyer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rhonda Plambeck
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tammy Galloway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgan Ernzen + Rhonda Plambeck11263% games+11.9% vs expected
Karen Stuckemeyer + Carolyn Braun5848% games−0.4% vs expected
Christina Sjolin + Karen Stuckemeyer2543% games−6.3% vs expected
Tammy Galloway + Christina Sjolin5358% games−7.3% vs expected
Tammy Galloway + Karen Stuckemeyer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Morgan Ernzen
38W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Carolyn Braun
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Christina Sjolin
22W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Stuckemeyer
44W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Rhonda Plambeck
20W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tammy Galloway
21W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.