Teams

MC YELLOW

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-11vs BM PINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeggy Hofstra / Shari Pew vs Elizabeth Zenk / Shelley Chism7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Workman / Deborah Bautista vs Nhung Van / Beth Cooper6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJanice Tanabe / Ana Bland vs Cheri Bradley / Anne Fanganello7-6, 6-4
2025-06-04vs LTC-M YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Bautista / Michelle Workman vs Diana Beck / Linda Sexton6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Sumpter / Pamela Catalano vs April Kobayashi / Nancy Driver4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAna Bland / Mai Lee vs Janet Marks / Shana Fonte6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-28vs SS-LGT ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeborah Bautista / Shari Pew vs Jennifer Johnson / Rhonda Patston6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathleen Sumpter / Peggy Hofstra vs Lynne Monnar / Melissa Miller6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAna Bland / Janice Tanabe vs Allison Langenderfer / Maria Hush1-6, 2-6
2025-05-21vs GR NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Workman / Deborah Bautista vs Char Eiken / Kim Rachwalski6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTammy Chamberlain / Peggy Hofstra vs Pauline Vargo / Vicki Kern7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPamela Catalano / Ana Bland vs Barbara Pryor / Jennifer Richey3-6, 5-7
2025-05-14vs LEBTC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeggy Hofstra / Shari Pew vs Amy Quinette / Ashley Franklin7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeborah Bautista / Michelle Workman vs Brooke Sterling / Lisa McGavern7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAna Bland / Mai Lee vs Jane Braaten / Danielle Butler5-7, 3-6
2025-05-07vs PH YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Sumpter / Tammy Chamberlain vs Melodie Harris / Brooke Fox6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Bautista / Peggy Hofstra vs Christy Brant / Suzanne Perkins6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Workman / Mai Lee vs Catherine Rollhaus / Wynne Freeman7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-04-30vs MC NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Bautista / Kathleen Sumpter vs Sharon Naylor / Ursula Hamel6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPamela Catalano / Tammy Chamberlain vs Lisa Pomerantz / Karen Morris6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAna Bland / Janice Tanabe vs Patricia Shaw / Teri Harrington6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Kathleen Sumpter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Deborah Bautista
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.40
Peggy Hofstra
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.31
Tammy Chamberlain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Michelle Workman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.06
Ana Bland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Pamela Catalano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Mai Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Janice Tanabe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shari Pew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Bland + Deborah Bautista3447% games+4.7% vs expected
Deborah Bautista + Kathleen Sumpter13464% games+1.7% vs expected
Ana Bland + Pamela Catalano51244% games−9.3% vs expected
Ana Bland + Mai Lee3444% gamesnot enough data
Ana Bland + Janice Tanabe3251% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Bautista + Michelle Workman5068% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Bautista + Shari Pew224 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Chamberlain + Pamela Catalano224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kathleen Sumpter
48W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Deborah Bautista
70W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Peggy Hofstra
29W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Tammy Chamberlain
116W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Michelle Workman
8W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Ana Bland
87W–109L career · 6 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Pamela Catalano
63W–96L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Mai Lee
27W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Janice Tanabe
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shari Pew
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.