Teams

Rogue Bandits v1.2

2026 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 2.94 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-24vs Ball of DutyLost 01
L#3 DoublesChris Angermayer / Don Bielen vs Christopher Vaughan / Eddie Dunn0-6, 6-7
2026-06-10vs Setsaholics AnonymousSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBrad Smith / Don Bielen vs Kevin Hartsig / Thomas Wiley6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEric Schneider / Woody Kessler vs John Tesnohlidek / Orlando Ciniglio1-6, 2-6
2026-06-01vs Setsaholics AnonymousLost 01
L#2 DoublesBill Agler / Don Bielen vs Mike McNabb / Erik Vegas5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-18vs Setsaholics AnonymousLost 01
L#3 DoublesDon Bielen / Mark Mclaughlin vs Orlando Ciniglio / John Tesnohlidek1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rogue Bandits v1.253221838311

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Michael Johnson
published
3.13
Matthew Rubio
published 3
3.06
Fred Costello
published 3
2.99
Eric Schneider
published 3
2.83
Bill Agler
published 3
2.83
2.67
Chris Angermayer
published 3
2.54
Mark Mclaughlin
published 2.5
2.52
Matt Koehl
published 3
Don Bielen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Woody Kessler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Angermayer + Matthew Rubio2737% games−0.5% vs expected
Michael Johnson + Matthew Rubio0829% gamesnot enough data
Woody Kessler + Eric Schneider0828% gamesnot enough data
Michael Johnson + Ernest Blackwelder2350% gamesnot enough data
Michael Johnson + Matt Koehl044 matchesnot enough data
Michael Johnson + Eric Schneider404 matchesnot enough data
Chris Angermayer + Ernest Blackwelder134 matchesnot enough data
Woody Kessler + Matt Koehl044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Johnson
43W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Matthew Rubio
77W–78L career · no lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Fred Costello
74W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Eric Schneider
16W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Bill Agler
82W–102L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Ernest Blackwelder
16W–21L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Chris Angermayer
52W–73L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
2.5
Mark Mclaughlin
10W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.54
3
Matt Koehl
57W–73L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.52
Don Bielen
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Woody Kessler
7W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.