Teams

Ossman/Nashville

2022 Tri-Level 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women - FRI AM

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Palina Beck
published
4.25
Lori Warrick
published
3.87
Ann Page
published 4.5
3.76
Shona Bumgardner
published
3.75
Janet Adamson
published
Brenda Ossman
published 4
3.71
Holly Ing
published 4
3.70
Lora Fox
published
3.70
Melinda Doty
published
3.67
Allison McNeely
published 4
3.67
Loralie Liggett
published
3.67
Cindy Knapp
published 4
3.38
Thalia Kahl
published
3.33
Jacqueline King
published 3.5
3.31
Julie Lavigne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Warrick + Janet Adamson5253% games−2.9% vs expected
Palina Beck + Melinda Doty213 matchesnot enough data
Palina Beck + Janet Adamson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Palina Beck
26W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
4.39
Lori Warrick
31W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Ann Page
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
3.87
Shona Bumgardner
41W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Janet Adamson
44W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Holly Ing
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Lora Fox
15W–14L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Melinda Doty
28W–14L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Allison McNeely
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Loralie Liggett
21W–28L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Cindy Knapp
38W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Thalia Kahl
27W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Jacqueline King
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Julie Lavigne
11W–20L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.