Teams

GEPTA/55&over/6.0W/Samonte/NMSU

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Celia Al-Tahan
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3
Barbara Basurto
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Anita Boss
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
Bertha McShea
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.21
Cecilia Burgos Gavaldon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 2.5
2.11
Cecilia Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
Dina Schlotterbeck
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Donna Gray
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Elizabeth Luscombe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ellen Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Esther McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Julieta Turner
published
Leticia Augsberger
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Lourdes Olivas
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Monica Bordagaray
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Patricia Samonte
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lourdes Olivas + Celia Al-Tahan273447% games+2.0% vs expected
Celia Al-Tahan + Anita Boss242248% games+1.8% vs expected
Lourdes Olivas + Anita Boss121248% games−0.2% vs expected
Dina Schlotterbeck + Celia Al-Tahan10658% gamesnot enough data
Leticia Augsberger + Esther McCarthy6943% gamesnot enough data
Lourdes Olivas + Monica Bordagaray3938% gamesnot enough data
Monica Bordagaray + Esther McCarthy3946% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Samonte + Lourdes Olivas4746% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Celia Al-Tahan
114W–159L career · 57 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Barbara Basurto
23W–31L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Anita Boss
83W–101L career · 34 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
2.5
Bertha McShea
4W–9L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cecilia Burgos Gavaldon
10W–31L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Cecilia Delgado
27W–43L career · 33 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Dina Schlotterbeck
60W–82L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Donna Gray
45W–48L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Luscombe
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ellen Hughes
74W–86L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Esther McCarthy
74W–87L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julieta Turner
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leticia Augsberger
26W–61L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lourdes Olivas
93W–117L career · 41 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Bordagaray
39W–97L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Samonte
30W–65L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.