Teams

ACAC Callaghan / Bartholomew

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-20vs SCC CacciottiWon 20
W#1 SinglesChristina Aeinan Kang vs Sara Manners6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMartinique Kandl vs Karin Speizer6-2, 6-2
2022-06-16vs Raintree MartinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Kathryn Williams vs Jennifer Morris / Suzanne Martin6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMartinique Kandl vs Corrine Cooper2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-06-15vs Twin Hickory YuSplit 11
L#1 SinglesChristina Aeinan Kang vs Rebecca Morgan5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMartinique Kandl / Annmarie Strachan vs Michelle Yu / Cathy Parker6-4, 6-0
2022-06-10vs Westwood AnthonyWon 20
W#1 SinglesChristina Aeinan Kang vs Margaret Burke6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMary Knick vs Jordan Harper6-0, 6-0
2022-06-08vs CCV WilliamsWon 10
W#2 SinglesChristina Aeinan Kang vs Christina Bier7-5, 6-1
2022-06-03vs HCC StinsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Kelsey / Mary Knick vs Elizabeth Betz / Kathleen Crotty3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-01Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChristina Aeinan Kang vs Aimee Vaughn - (DQ)*6-7, 2-6
2022-05-20vs Twin Hickory YuWon 20
W#2 DoublesNikki Callaghan / Mary Knick vs Jennifer Schwarz / Lisa Frazier7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDawn Kelsey / Martinique Kandl vs Michelle Yu / Lisa Taylor6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #2 Singles 55%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 4
3.46
Martinique Kandl
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Mary Knick
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.23
Nikki Callaghan
published
3.16
Dawn Kelsey
published 3.5
3.16
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
3.15
Irene Quilez
published 3.5
3.14
Beth Farnsworth
published 3.5
3.04
Annmarie Strachan
published 3.5
2.69
Theresa Bartholomew
published
2.66
Jackie Granger
published 3
2.55
Rosita Torres
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–167L career · 11 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Martinique Kandl
167W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Mary Knick
204W–130L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Nikki Callaghan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Dawn Kelsey
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Irene Quilez
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Beth Farnsworth
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Annmarie Strachan
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Theresa Bartholomew
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Jackie Granger
20W–14L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Rosita Torres
5W–16L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.