← Teams

WI Adult 40&O 8.0MX GML Lake Country WAC Abhold

2026 WI Mixed 40 & Over · WI Mixed 40 & Over 8.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.70 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-16vs WI Adult 40&O 8.0MX GML Lake Country WAC WebsterLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDan Eggers / Kathy Mueller vs Gerard Goglia / Eliza Audley3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Kimmel / Tina Kadrich vs Manolito Kehoss / Michelle Webster3-6, 4-6
2026-05-08vs WI Adult 40&O 8.0MX GML Lake Country WAC WebsterLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesBruce Budde / Mary Berg vs Manolito Kehoss / Anne Pham3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Mueller / Daniel Kimmel vs Michael Boyer / Julie Wolf1-6, 0-6
2026-05-02vs WI Adult 40&O 8.0MX GML Lake Country WAC WebsterLost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBruce Budde / Micky Abhold vs Steve Sobieski / Charlotte Toboyek0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDan Eggers / Tina Kadrich vs Daniel Henkel / Eliza Audley2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Kimmel / Susan Lutz vs Trigg Knerr / Rae Krivohlavek7-5, 6-4
2026-04-11vs WI Adult 40&O 8.0MX GML Lake Country WAC WebsterLost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDan Eggers / Susan Lutz vs Daniel Henkel / Anne Pham3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBruce Budde / Micky Abhold vs Steve Sobieski / Charlotte Toboyek4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Kimmel / Mary Berg vs Michael Boyer / Julie Wolf4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Mixed 40 & Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 40&O 8.0MX GML Lake Country WAC Webster40111250
2WI Adult 40&O 8.0MX GML Lake Country WAC Abhold0411122141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Susan Lutz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —
3.70
Tina Kadrich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Bruce Budde
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Kathy Mueller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —
3.44
Dan Eggers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Micky Abhold
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Daniel Kimmel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Susan Lutz
39W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Tina Kadrich
76W–80L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Bruce Budde
28W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.65
—
Kathy Mueller
93W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Dan Eggers
39W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Micky Abhold
66W–103L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Daniel Kimmel
31W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.