Teams

Ly.Manweiler18T

2026 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-31vs Ci.Winzenz18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Karen McKee vs Cindy Winzenz / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade1-6, 0-6
2026-07-24vs Me.Delorme18TLost 12
L#1 DoublesTori Sutler / Molly Briggs vs Neeta Vora / Felita Clark2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLisa ONeill / Kara Rectenwald vs Ayako Otsuka / Julie Rogers7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJennifer London / Karen Hagens vs Mary Zimardo / Stephanie Tracey3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-17vs Ma.Sredl18TSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa ONeill / Tori Sutler vs Tanya Parise / Brandy Kmiec1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Dwyer / Emily Uhland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-07vs Yu.Hager18TLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Boyd / McKinsey Blount vs Renee Stegman / Chunyan Xie3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Briggs / Lynne Manweiler vs Yuwie Hager / Jenny Nguyen6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer London / Emily Uhland vs Kelly Townsend / Vanese Clough6-1, 6-0
2026-06-26vs Ci.Winzenz18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesTori Sutler / Maggie Patterson vs Shannon Lawrence / Brook Holton Sheahan1-6, 1-6
2026-06-19vs Me.Delorme18TLost 12
W#1 DoublesTori Sutler / McKinsey Blount vs Allison Ostrander / Felita Clark6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Molly Briggs vs Melissa DeLorme / Mallory Biringer1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Uhland / Jennifer London vs Lawrie Givner / Virginia Griffin2-6, 0-6
2026-06-12vs Ma.Sredl18TWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Hagens / Emily Uhland vs Bethany Perkins / Allyson Schneider6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKara Rectenwald / Lisa ONeill vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-29vs Yu.Hager18TWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa ONeill / Tori Sutler vs Connie Peterson / Hallie Shinn6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren McKee / Annette Page vs Yuwie Hager / Rachael Kiker1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Brock / Emily Uhland vs Dianna Erwin / Kelly Townsend6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
McKinsey Blount
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.12
Kimberly Boyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Tori Sutler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
4.01
Lisa ONeill
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.91
Molly Briggs
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.87
Kara Rectenwald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Karen McKee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Annette Page
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Emily Uhland
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.56
Maggie Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Lynne Manweiler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Jessica Brock
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.40
Karen Hagens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Laura Dwyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

McKinsey Blount + Tori Sutler9069% games+15.3% vs expected
Tori Sutler + Lisa ONeill6061% games+6.1% vs expected
Molly Briggs + Tori Sutler4153% gamesnot enough data
Annette Page + Molly Briggs404 matchesnot enough data
Emily Uhland + Maggie Patterson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
McKinsey Blount
64W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
Kimberly Boyd
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
4
Tori Sutler
193W–54L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
4.02
Lisa ONeill
23W–2L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
4.01
Molly Briggs
32W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Kara Rectenwald
72W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
Karen McKee
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Annette Page
19W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Emily Uhland
86W–70L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.62
Maggie Patterson
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Lynne Manweiler
90W–123L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jessica Brock
12W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Karen Hagens
78W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Laura Dwyer
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.