Teams

*2-DAdams-Eno-65-GR

2024 Eno River Adult 65 & Over · 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-24vs *1-KChaney-YMCALost 01
L#3 DoublesMillie Hunter / Pat Rowe vs Sally Mauriello / Elaine Bardes0-1
2024-04-16vs *3-KCuller-HRWon 20
W#2 DoublesDeb Lanier / Susana Harvey vs Debbie Fuller / Karin Yoch6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Adams / Millie Hunter vs Nancy Riefkohl / Kaye Culler6-0, 6-3
2024-03-26vs *1-KChaney-YMCAWon 21
L#1 DoublesMillie Hunter / Claudia White vs Donna Newell / Sally Mauriello5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Mary Parker vs Karen Bordeaux / Karen Heinemann6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDeb Lanier / Debbie Powell vs Alice Stenstrom / Elaine Bardes6-2, 6-3
2024-03-26vs *3-KCuller-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusana Harvey / Mary Parker vs Sheana Funkhouser / Wendy McCorkle6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDeb Lanier / Debbie Powell vs Kaye Culler / Nancy Riefkohl6-1, 6-1
2024-03-24vs *3-KCuller-HRWon 20
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Mary Parker vs Rebecca Georgi / Mary Panek6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDeb Lanier / Debbie Powell vs Karen Sindelar / Karin Yoch6-0, 6-1
2024-02-27vs *1-KChaney-YMCAWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebbie Powell / Deb Lanier vs Kathy Reedy / Alice Stenstrom6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Mary Parker vs Denise Heinze / DJ Maniace6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMillie Hunter / Melissa Fitzpatrick vs Katherine Chaney / Sally Mauriello6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Susana Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.59
Deb Lanier
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.53
Debbie Powell
published 3.5
3.46
Melissa Fitzpatrick
published
3.34
Cheryl Stevens
published 3.5
3.00
Millie Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Pat Rowe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Julie Barnhart
published
Patricia Hurley
published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deb Lanier + Susana Harvey27668% games+2.9% vs expected
Debbie Powell + Deb Lanier9261% games−3.7% vs expected
Millie Hunter + Pat Rowe3548% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susana Harvey
401W–157L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.71
3.5
Deb Lanier
487W–223L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.59
3.5
Debbie Powell
30W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
Melissa Fitzpatrick
39W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Cheryl Stevens
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Millie Hunter
64W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Pat Rowe
91W–123L career · 1 line in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
Julie Barnhart
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
0
Patricia Hurley
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.