Teams

Ellen Chubak

2024 Flex Singles League - Women · 3.5 Women

1 player · average NTRP / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

View scouting list →
Flight standings23 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cecilia McCall000000
2Dorothy Brill000000
3Marta Piksinska000000
4Meredith Naidorf000000
5Margaret Steinbach011003
6Amy Moore011005
7Mira Schirripa011017
8Randa Trivisonno0101212
9Cynthia Goodstein0101212
10Trudie Gubitz0101212
11Latoya McCrea0220114
12Ellen Chubak0211217
13Kirstin Cole0202423
14Alina Leonova0202425
15Jenna Stanley0312429
16Amanda Cotter0312535
17Jill Guzzetti0303636
18Shannon Roper0430129
19Claire Hurley0422434
20Maureen Goodrich0531447
21allison hickey0523748
22Brooke Craemer0660021
23Caitlin Moffett0642544

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Ellen Chubak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ellen Chubak
82W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.