Teams

Here for the Summer

2026 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-26vs Sugar & SliceWon 10
W#1 DoublesTaylor Hotvet / Kate Markey vs Lori Beehner / Daria Opekunova6-4, 6-1
2026-07-26vs MI-Summer-FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesTaylor Hotvet / Kate Markey vs Julia Bai / Wenjing Yin6-2, 6-3
2026-07-23vs Sets in the CityLost 01
L#1 DoublesTaylor Hotvet / Kate Markey vs Alice Chang / Jamie Kim3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-14vs Dino NuggiesLost 01
L#1 DoublesTaylor Hotvet / Kate Markey vs Angela Xu / Laura Tran0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Taylor Hotvet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Elizabeth Sofranek
published 3.5
3.29
Kate Markey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Hotvet + Kate Markey224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Taylor Hotvet
24W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
3.5
Elizabeth Sofranek
70W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Kate Markey
36W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.