Teams

MCAC:Harbilas:Harbilas

2022 Cape Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed Flt 1

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-22vs Lakeville:Howard:HowardLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauriene Morin / Jon Stetkis Sperco vs Margaret Hart / Aaron Petruski6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKarin Menegay / Joseph Bucchanio vs Nicole Dias / Keith Linhart2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeanne Bissonnette / Robert Majewski vs Elizabeth Straub / David Power0-6, 4-6
2022-05-08vs Sesuit:Braude:BraudeLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlison Harbilas / Kevin Kelly vs Jeffrey Hyde / Elisa Zawadzkas6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeanne Bissonnette / Jon Stetkis Sperco vs Pavel Braude / Kimberly Gazal Santos6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKarin Menegay / Joseph Bucchanio vs Kyra Travis / Ivan Petaev2-6, 5-7
2022-04-24vs Sesuit:Braude:BraudeLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Lesnick / John Robertson vs Benjamin Green / Kyra Travis2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTia Lilly / James Veninger vs Kimberly Gazal Santos / Timothy Santos6-7, 4-5
L#3 DoublesLauriene Morin / Michael McMahon vs Alicia Hyde / Gregory Cole6-2, 2-4, 0-1
2022-04-10vs Lakeville:Howard:HowardLost 03
L#1 DoublesTia Lilly / Robert Majewski vs Zoe Kelliher / David Kroll3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJane Craig / Peter Weinman vs Elizabeth Straub / David Power2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Lesnick / John Robertson vs Christopher Dohner / Carolina Gonzalez3-6, 5-4, 0-1
2022-04-03vs Sesuit:Braude:BraudeWon 30
W#1 DoublesTia Lilly / James Veninger vs Anna Braude / Pavel Braude7-5, 5-4
W#2 DoublesLauriene Morin / Michael McMahon vs Kyra Travis / Robert Mahoney7-6, 4-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Lesnick / John Robertson vs Julia Boiko / Gregory Cole6-7, 4-3, 1-0
2022-03-20vs Lakeville:Howard:HowardLost 12
L#1 DoublesTia Lilly / James Veninger vs Zoe Kelliher / Aaron Petruski3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKarin Menegay / Jonathan Hagenstein vs Jenifer Clarkson / Fernando Dias4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeanne Bissonnette / Michael McMahon vs Edvar Jardim / Margaret Hart6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Mixed Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lakeville:Howard:Howard6015310122
2Sesuit:Braude:Braude2481022175
3MCAC:Harbilas:Harbilas1541430198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
James Veninger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Jane Craig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Lauriene Morin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Alison Harbilas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Jeanne Bissonnette
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Lesnick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
John Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jon Stetkis Sperco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jonathan Hagenstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Bucchanio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Karin Menegay
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Peter Weinman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Majewski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tia Lilly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Craig + Peter Weinman221054% gamesnot enough data
James Veninger + Tia Lilly22857% gamesnot enough data
Jane Craig + James Veninger15063% gamesnot enough data
Lauriene Morin + Jon Stetkis Sperco4362% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Lesnick + John Robertson2434% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Bucchanio + Karin Menegay2346% gamesnot enough data
Karin Menegay + Jonathan Hagenstein4160% gamesnot enough data
Jeanne Bissonnette + Jon Stetkis Sperco033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Veninger
141W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
Jane Craig
117W–44L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Lauriene Morin
131W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Alison Harbilas
59W–65L career · 1 line in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Jeanne Bissonnette
99W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Jennifer Lesnick
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Robertson
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jon Stetkis Sperco
60W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jonathan Hagenstein
51W–19L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Bucchanio
54W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karin Menegay
39W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Weinman
157W–80L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Robert Majewski
66W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tia Lilly
51W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.