Teams

Double Trouble

2023 Summer Smash Doubles · Women's 3.0

5 players · average NTRP 2.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-26vs Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrannon Earles / Deborah Cashion vs Kathy Collins / Mindy Murray0-6, 0-6
2023-08-01vs Deuce BabyLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharleyn Mahoney / Brannon Earles vs Staci Shafer / Zenaida Camacho1-6, 1-6
2023-07-20vs Summer nightsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharleyn Mahoney / Mollyrose Wright vs Marianna Geyer / Ana Paula Schweitzer2-6, 1-6
2023-07-16vs Volley VixensLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrandon Bray / Deborah Cashion vs Maile Kim / Lydia Dyer1-6, 2-6
2023-06-15vs Serving SummerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharleyn Mahoney / Deborah Cashion vs Casey Prince / Donna Atwood0-6, 1-6
2023-06-14vs Summer CrushersLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrandon Bray / Mollyrose Wright vs Rhonda Kiser / Sondra Simmons0-6, 0-6
2023-06-09vs Natalie&Julie’s Smash TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrannon Earles / Deborah Cashion vs Natalie von Allmen / Rachel Boisvert0-6, 0-6
2023-05-24vs A Little Slice of SummerLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Cashion / Mollyrose Wright vs Mitzi Arrowood / Kristie Surbeck2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Brandon Bray
published 3
2.56
Charleyn Mahoney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Mollyrose Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Brannon Earles
published 2.5
2.01
Deborah Cashion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Cashion + Mollyrose Wright1837% games−5.4% vs expected
Charleyn Mahoney + Deborah Cashion5647% games−8.4% vs expected
Charleyn Mahoney + Mollyrose Wright2626% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brandon Bray
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.11
3
Charleyn Mahoney
57W–123L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Mollyrose Wright
50W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Brannon Earles
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Deborah Cashion
35W–136L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.