Teams

THPRD-Yuan

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.91 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
NANDA SIDDAIAH
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Mumukshu Patel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Ben Howard
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Thomas Feix
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.70
Igor Landais
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Jacob Morris
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Steve Sun
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Hunsu PARK
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Joel Fenner
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.53
Frank Shen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Edmund Yuan
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
NANDA SIDDAIAH
69W–30L career
0%98%2%
3.83
4
Mumukshu Patel
19W–13L career
1%97%2%
3.81
4
Ben Howard
36W–16L career
2%97%1%
3.74
4
Thomas Feix
22W–9L career
3%96%1%
3.73
4
Igor Landais
62W–55L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Jacob Morris
1W–6L career · type S
13%87%0%
3.64
4
Steve Sun
51W–78L career
6%94%0%
3.64
4
Hunsu PARK
10W–9L career
25%75%0%
3.55
3.5
Joel Fenner
26W–18L career · type S
0%70%30%
3.55
4
Frank Shen
38W–69L career
25%75%0%
3.53
3.5
Edmund Yuan
113W–86L career
0%94%6%
3.42

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.