Teams

Fee-Albrecht

2021 Brevard Adult 18 & Over-Early Start · 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.21 / REGION_4

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Altair Watson
published 3.5
3.24
Amber Saxon
published 3.5
3.20
Denise Stanley
published 3.5
3.12
Xu Sue Huang
published
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
2.69
Traci Radcliff
published
2.68
Erin Conway
published 3
Kristin Matthews
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Altair Watson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Amber Saxon
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Denise Stanley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Xu Sue Huang
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Christina M Tuccio
3W–3L career · type T · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Elizabeth Findley
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Traci Radcliff
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Erin Conway
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Kristin Matthews
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.