Teams

MTC Britzius 12:00

2022 Women's Daytime Doubles · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Lori Henrich
published
3.58
Jaime Pellegrene
published 4
3.48
Emily Starita
published 3.5
3.46
Amy Gammill
published 3.5
3.44
Jamie Parrish
published 3.5
3.43
Donnette Tanner
published 3.5
3.37
Ruth Eliason
published
3.36
Stephanie Harlan
published
3.25
Ellen Oglesby
published 3.5
3.21
Karla Greene
published
3.20
Robbie Spicer
published 3.5
3.04
Michelle Sandberg
published
Kelly Menth
published
Kristin von Seggern
published
Loa Ann Coyle
published
Scott Swanson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Henrich
30W–40L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Jaime Pellegrene
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Emily Starita
38W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Amy Gammill
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Jamie Parrish
51W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Donnette Tanner
14W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
Ruth Eliason
263W–178L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Stephanie Harlan
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Ellen Oglesby
11W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Karla Greene
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Robbie Spicer
33W–26L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Michelle Sandberg
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
Kelly Menth
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristin von Seggern
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Loa Ann Coyle
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Swanson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.