Teams

Norris: Smithfield

2024 IA 40 & Over Adult League · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-12-09vs IA/Baddeloo-Mullin/40&Over3.0WLost 13
L#1 DoublesErin Langdon / Joy Purdy vs Sonja Heying / Cheryl Minor1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Novak vs Jaime Morgan6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLyla Schweiger / Andrea Norris vs Brenda Klein / Michele Staub3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSorina Abernathey / Kristi Whitham vs Allison Hales / Mary Everett1-6, 0-6
2023-11-04vs Jenkins & Wichhart: NDACWon 32
W#1 DoublesJENNIFER HEBERT / Yara Conway vs Brenda Wichhart / Laura Frey Law6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichelle Novak vs Karen Davison6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Norris / Sandra Monahan vs Kathy Jenkins / Sadhna Jani6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJoy Purdy / Kristi Whitham vs Carla Schmidt / Emelyn Harris6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesLyla Schweiger / Tamera Preston vs Lisa Hammer / Angelyn Craddock3-6, 1-6
2023-09-23vs Champion & Everett: LifetimeLost 13
W#1 DoublesJENNIFER HEBERT / Lydia Brown vs Julie Kuhlers / Teri Everett5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Norris vs Carolyn Camp0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSorina Abernathey / Sandra Monahan vs Sarah Piziali / Lori Hanson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoy Purdy / Lyla Schweiger vs Kristine Chung / Huafeng Shi1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Michelle Novak
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
JENNIFER HEBERT
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Erin Langdon
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.80
Kristi Whitham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Andrea Norris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.65
Anne Jasper
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.65
Sandra Monahan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
Lyla Schweiger
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Joy Purdy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Ekberg
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lydia Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sorina Abernathey
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tamera Preston
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Yara Conway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JENNIFER HEBERT + Michelle Novak4160% games+12.9% vs expected
Sandra Monahan + Andrea Norris4155% games+9.3% vs expected
Sorina Abernathey + Sandra Monahan0633% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Ekberg + JENNIFER HEBERT123 matchesnot enough data
Sorina Abernathey + Andrea Norris033 matchesnot enough data
Sorina Abernathey + Lyla Schweiger213 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Monahan + JENNIFER HEBERT213 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Norris + Lyla Schweiger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Novak
72W–40L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.32
JENNIFER HEBERT
43W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.19
Erin Langdon
31W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.88
Kristi Whitham
15W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Andrea Norris
13W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Anne Jasper
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
Sandra Monahan
16W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Lyla Schweiger
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
Joy Purdy
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.40
Elizabeth Ekberg
11W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lydia Brown
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sorina Abernathey
8W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tamera Preston
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Yara Conway
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.