Teams

Song - Smiles and Laughs singles4.0

2025 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-09-20vs Drury - You Cannot Be SeriousWon 10
W#2 SinglesHanlun Song vs Florin Iancu6-0, 6-0
2025-09-16vs Kendall - Summer BashiSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMofei Chen vs Sam Jacobson1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJesse Cebulash vs Joshua Folk6-4, 6-2
2025-09-10vs Drury - You Cannot Be SeriousWon 10
W#3 SinglesMofei Chen vs Robert Ogrodnik6-2, 6-1
2025-09-05vs Kendall - Summer BashiLost 02
L#2 SinglesHanlun Song vs Scott Mennealy3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMofei Chen vs Scott Aronson3-6, 1-6
2025-08-28vs Kendall - Summer BashiLost 01
L#2 SinglesMofei Chen vs Scott Aronson1-6, 5-7
2025-08-13vs Kendall - Summer BashiLost 02
L#1 SinglesJesse Cebulash vs Scott Aronson2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMofei Chen vs J Nathan3-6, 6-7
2025-08-04vs Drury - You Cannot Be SeriousWon 10
W#2 SinglesHanlun Song vs Mark Wang6-2, 6-2
2025-07-31vs Kendall - Summer BashiWon 10
W#1 SinglesJesse Cebulash vs Scott Mennealy6-5
2025-07-25vs Drury - You Cannot Be SeriousWon 21
W#1 SinglesEmre Yener vs Robert Ogrodnik6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPeter Zhu vs Chris Odell6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesChungfu Yang vs Shawn Drury3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
George Liu
published
3.96
Jesse Cebulash
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #3 Singles 11% · published 4
3.83
Hanlun Song
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.56
Chungfu Yang
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Peter Zhu
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.49
James Wen
published
3.37
Mofei Chen
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3.5
Emre Yener
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Ping-Jung Liu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Weiling Tan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hanlun Song + Jesse Cebulash6169% gamesnot enough data
Hanlun Song + Mofei Chen5068% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

George Liu
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Jesse Cebulash
330W–107L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
3.5
Hanlun Song
159W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.83
3.5
Chungfu Yang
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Peter Zhu
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
James Wen
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Mofei Chen
31W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Emre Yener
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ping-Jung Liu
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Weiling Tan
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.