Teams

Olympic

2025 FALL A18&O WEEKEND · FALL 18&O 3.0 MEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-01-11vs The Players ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesTom Nichols / Miguel Sanchez Vasquez vs Lew Pawluk / Kos Shilo6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTonny Michel vs Christopher Cazel7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLarry Pliskin / Mark Westman vs Jeff Patter / Derek Knueve2-6, 3-6
2024-12-19vs ScarboroughLost 04
L#1 DoublesMark Westman / Deshon Hervey vs Brant Jarrett / Yevgeniy Gorshenin2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTonny Michel vs Kevin Kimble2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTommy Shannon / Larry Pliskin vs Brian Dunfee / Josue Santos3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesChaojie Feng vs Camerin Allen2-6, 2-6
2024-11-16vs Racquet ClubSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrian Davenport / Mark Westman vs Sravanth Kuppam / Nick Rinker6-7, 1-4
L#1 SinglesDeshon Hervey vs Jeff Tsao2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMiguel Sanchez Vasquez / Tom Nichols vs Hoi Nguyen / John Mincy6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTonny Michel vs Tommy Vu6-3, 6-3
2024-11-09vs ElysiumLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Davenport / Deshon Hervey vs Andres Perez / Leonardo Ramos0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTommy Shannon / Tom Chandler vs Steven Paull / Ajay Srivastava3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTonny Michel vs Murthy Puchha2-6, 2-6
2024-11-02vs WickertreeLost 04
L#1 DoublesMiguel Sanchez Vasquez / Daniel Swetnam vs Aaron Ayres / Evan Hale2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDeshon Hervey vs Greg Poulos1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTom Chandler / Larry Pliskin vs David Janklow / Jason Ramage1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesChaojie Feng vs Kyle Schneider1-6, 1-6
2024-10-26vs Racquet ClubSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMiguel Sanchez Vasquez / Brian Davenport vs Doug Dixon / Andy Shafran3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDeshon Hervey vs Tommy Vu6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTom Chandler / Larry Pliskin vs Chris Anitori / Chris Pincock0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesTonny Michel vs Nicholas Hlivak6-2, 6-3
2024-10-19vs The Players ClubLost 03
L#1 DoublesTom Nichols / Brian Davenport vs Sam Mikhail / Jason Sayat4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDeshon Hervey vs Lew Pawluk1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Swetnam / Larry Pliskin vs Christopher Artinian / Corey Dehus2-6, 0-6
2024-10-12vs ScarboroughLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Swetnam / Brian Davenport vs Brant Jarrett / John Toirov1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesDeshon Hervey vs Mark Behrens5-1
L#2 DoublesTom Chandler / Miguel Sanchez Vasquez vs Yevgeniy Gorshenin / Fred Levy3-6, 2-6
2024-09-28vs ElysiumLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Davenport / Tom Nichols vs Andres Perez / John Muenz6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChaojie Feng vs Milind Madani1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTommy Shannon / Daniel Swetnam vs Steve Detweiler / Abhijith Sadananda0-6, 2-6
2024-09-14vs WickertreeLost 04
L#1 DoublesTommy Shannon / Mark Westman vs Christopher Taylor / Greg Poulos0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTonny Michel vs Taylor King1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLarry Pliskin / Tom Chandler vs James Taylor / Bill Novotny1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesChaojie Feng vs Rami Hanna4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 3.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Brian Davenport
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Tonny Michel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.75
Tom Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Chaojie Feng
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Daniel Swetnam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Miguel Sanchez Vasquez
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.57
Deshon Hervey
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.22
Larry Pliskin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tommy Shannon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Swetnam + Larry Pliskin0823% games−16.5% vs expected
Deshon Hervey + Larry Pliskin0829% gamesnot enough data
Miguel Sanchez Vasquez + Tom Nichols314 matchesnot enough data
Deshon Hervey + Tonny Michel044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brian Davenport
23W–20L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
Tonny Michel
9W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Tom Nichols
22W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Chaojie Feng
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Daniel Swetnam
0W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Miguel Sanchez Vasquez
7W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Deshon Hervey
4W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Larry Pliskin
1W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.22
Tommy Shannon
2W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.