Teams

CCV-Huffman/Brannan

2024 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.93 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-03-10vs Westwood-Racelis/CosbyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Parker / Kirsti Goodwin vs Matthew Oatts / Jennifer White6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-24vs ACAC-Larue 7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesTaylor Brannan / Kirsti Goodwin vs Denise Weisberg / Darrell Eakes2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-01-12vs MAC-WHITEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Parker / Kirsti Goodwin vs Sacha Shaygan / Toni Bolden-Ealey7-6, 2-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Megan Hodges
published
4.00
3.86
Whitson Huffman
published
3.76
3.74
Ashley Millen
published 4
3.65
Joseph Parker
published
3.65
Alison Avery
published 4
3.63
3.59
Anne Henry
published 4.5
3.50
Jonathan Henry
published
3.41
Nathan Knight
published
3.34
Kristin Mullins
published
3.31
Stephanie Parker
published
3.14
Taylor Brannan
published
3.04
Spotty Robins
published
3.04
Connell Mullins
published 3.5
3.01
Kirsti Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Patrick Toohers
published
Elizabeth Toohers
published
Robin Reifsnider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitson Huffman + Alexandra Huffman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Hodges
19W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Catherine Benevento
13W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
Whitson Huffman
18W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Alexandra Huffman
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Ashley Millen
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Joseph Parker
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Alison Avery
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Cary Campbell-Knight
17W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.63
4.5
Anne Henry
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
Jonathan Henry
29W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Nathan Knight
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Kristin Mullins
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Stephanie Parker
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.31
Taylor Brannan
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Spotty Robins
23W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Connell Mullins
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
Kirsti Goodwin
56W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Patrick Toohers
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Elizabeth Toohers
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robin Reifsnider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.