Teams

CP:Serves You Right 40 : Mostofi/Raskopf

2026 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.0 W - 4

26 players · average NTRP 3.07 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-02-28vs NC:Sets In The City:Gallagher/RoseSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Raskopf / Kari Bilik vs Kiersten Winokur / Amy Devito6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJanice Kopits vs Cynthia Goodstein6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCatherine Lifeso / Amanda Michael vs Leah Aizen / Danielle Shapiro3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNaina McKinley / Kerrie Braff vs Ellen Cummings / Michelle Hanover3-6, 4-6
2026-02-21vs NC:Wildcards:TelescoLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Escajadillo / Amanda Michael vs Claudia Gill / Tania Prochilo0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesErin Claytor vs Kim Barr7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesStefanie Desai / Sarah Kim vs Claire Traugott / Cathy Witt5-7, 4-6
2026-02-08vs CP:Simply Smashing:Catto/SimmonsWon 31
W#1 DoublesDana Post / Ingrid Mudge vs Nancy Ossenfort / Annemarie Rothe6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesErin Claytor vs Lei Liang6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Chu / Maha Mostofi vs Paisley Fenyes / Georgia Dyer2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Michael / Catherine Lifeso vs Ghada Jabbour / Dana Greco6-2, 6-1
2026-02-01vs NC:Sets In The City:Gallagher/RoseLost 13
L#1 DoublesAmy Raskopf / Melissa Escajadillo vs Lorri Ahl / Jill Guzzetti5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDana Post vs Chrissy Khachane6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNaina McKinley / Catherine Lifeso vs Karen Gallagher / Sandra Rose6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Morrill Webb / Kerrie Braff vs Yolande Casey / Danielle Shapiro6-7, 6-6
W#1 DoublesAmy Raskopf / Elana Minkove vs Barbara Yallop / Lori Malerba6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesErin Claytor vs Jessica Morin6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Chu / Dana Post vs Beth Steinkraus / Jane Renaud6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCatherine Lifeso / Amanda Michael vs Leslie Kelly / Jennifer Keehlwetter6-0, 6-3
W#1 DoublesElana Minkove / Ingrid Mudge vs Susan Sobocinski Puchert / Lianne Owen6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDana Post vs Makiko Coakley7-5, 2-5
W#2 DoublesMaha Mostofi / Lisa Chu vs Donna Lempit / AnneMarie Tartaglia6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStefanie Desai / Amanda Callahan vs Anna Sarly / Jordana Ammann2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-11-16vs NC:Wildcards:TelescoLost 13
L#1 DoublesDana Post / Elana Minkove vs Kristie Breed / Tania Prochilo6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesErin Claytor vs Kim Barr7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaha Mostofi / Catherine Lifeso vs Carrie Laska / Michelle Miller3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Levey / Amanda Michael vs Kelly Giordano / Cathy Witt7-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMelissa Escajadillo / Dana Post vs Carissa Siegner / Clarissa Cannavino6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmanda Callahan vs Diana Yepes7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKari Bilik / Sarah Kim vs Jessica Murray / AnneMarie Tartaglia2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Morrill Webb / Serina Dansker vs Katya Rynearson / Sara Goff0-6, 3-6
2025-10-26vs CP:Simply Smashing:Catto/SimmonsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKari Bilik / Ingrid Mudge vs Marlena Simmons / Tina Reiser4-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Chu vs Jaclyn Aronson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Morrill Webb / Melissa Escajadillo vs Georgia Dyer / Paisley Fenyes2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Lifeso / Jessica Levey vs Megan McFarland / Lei Liang6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKari Bilik / Dana Post vs Ingrid Bell / Karen Knapp7-6, 5-4
W#1 SinglesErin Claytor vs Elizabeth Gosk6-7, 4-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Boulier / Melissa Escajadillo vs Tracy Marra / Cara Lyn Mathews6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Morrill Webb / Kerrie Braff vs Jane Renaud / Beth Steinkraus2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 3.0 W - 4
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14S:Set 2 Win:Tuohy/Durden01030825285
2MRC:Grand Slammers:Mulhall/Dowd010261229292
3NC:Wildcards:Telesco010251029302
4FIT:Alley Gators:Sekhon/Henrich010261432306
5WRC:Team 40 And Then Some:Woolverton010261433317
6CP:Simply Smashing:Catto/Simmons010221535329
7TCT:3.0 40 Racquettes:Buschauer/Chang010221536339
8NC:Sets In The City:Gallagher/Rose010191636344
9TCT: Love 2 Play: Eustace/Adams010221537352
10OGT:Synergy:DuToit010201638334
11CP:Serves You Right 40 : Mostofi/Raskopf010191740374
12OGT:Notorious OGT:Huang/Haight010211841344
13TRC:Star Shots:Gonzalez/Gallagher010211944330
14CP:Tightly Strung:Cintron010191945352
15CP:You Got Served:Kaplan010172047394
16CP:Serves You Right 3.0:Marra/Smith010142453390
17INT:Slice Girls: Seigner/Cannavino010102759401
184S:Lob Squad:Sargeantson01063063431
19WST:Drop Shots:Rosoff/Wylie01073167441
20GF:Shoreline Storm:Rieger/Baumgaertner01053573463

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 26 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Katie Benedict
published 3.5
3.16
Kari Bilik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Katherine Boulier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Athena Maikish
published 3
2.93
Catherine Lifeso
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
2.89
Dana Post
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.87
Erin Claytor
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.87
Lisa Chu
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.86
Naina McKinley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Ingrid Mudge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Janice Kopits
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.84
Amanda Michael
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.83
Elana Minkove
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Amy Raskopf
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Wendy Sayles
published 3
2.74
Melissa Escajadillo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.72
Kerrie Braff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Amie Willis
published 3
2.67
Sarah Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Maha Mostofi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.54
Serina Dansker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Jessica Levey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Stefanie Desai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Amanda Callahan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.45
Lisa Morrill Webb
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Serina Dansker + Naina McKinley6460% games+14.9% vs expected
Dana Post + Kari Bilik8270% games+12.2% vs expected
Catherine Lifeso + Wendy Sayles4257% games+8.3% vs expected
Amy Raskopf + Maha Mostofi5453% games+8.1% vs expected
Christa FitzPatrick + Katherine Boulier8453% games+7.0% vs expected
Christa FitzPatrick + Melissa Escajadillo4352% games+4.8% vs expected
Serina Dansker + Jessica Levey5750% games+2.8% vs expected
Janice Kopits + Maha Mostofi11951% games+2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katie Benedict
89W–45L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Kari Bilik
132W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Katherine Boulier
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Athena Maikish
50W–32L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Catherine Lifeso
30W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Christa FitzPatrick
19W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Dana Post
71W–60L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Erin Claytor
27W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Lisa Chu
35W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
Naina McKinley
19W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Ingrid Mudge
38W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Janice Kopits
77W–119L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Amanda Michael
41W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Elana Minkove
100W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Amy Raskopf
43W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Wendy Sayles
50W–44L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Melissa Escajadillo
20W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Kerrie Braff
50W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Amie Willis
13W–18L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Sarah Kim
49W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.67
Maha Mostofi
67W–90L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
2.64
Serina Dansker
18W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.54
Jessica Levey
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
Stefanie Desai
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Amanda Callahan
7W–16L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Lisa Morrill Webb
22W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.