Teams

KC-CC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.06 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-14vs KC-RH BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesKarla Elliot / Lara Callas vs Debbie Lathrop / Laura MacKe6-1, 6-1
2024-05-24vs PH GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesKarla Elliot / Lenora Louie Phelps vs Melodie Harris / Alicia Guerra6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-17vs SS-H TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesLara Callas / Beth Day vs Becky Hodous / Lana Banbury7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-13vs BM REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLara Callas / Karla Elliot vs Sandy McGregor / Jenny Kelly7-5, 6-2
2024-05-10vs KC-RH BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesKarla Elliot / Lenora Louie Phelps vs Susan Conroy / Debbie Lathrop6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Lara Callas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.88
3.82
Stephanie Grace
published
3.82
Karla Elliot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Debra West
published 4
3.79
3.75
Heidi Mueller
published
Candi Carpenito
published 4
3.72
Anita Burns
published 4
3.72
Beth Day
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karla Elliot + Lara Callas6164% games+11.0% vs expected
Beth Day + Lenora Louie Phelps4354% games+6.1% vs expected
Karla Elliot + Lenora Louie Phelps181453% games+0.8% vs expected
Heidi Mueller + Debra West11657% games+0.2% vs expected
Stephanie Wiesing + Beth Day7748% games−5.8% vs expected
Stephanie Grace + Beth Day1441% games−18.9% vs expected
Anita Burns + Debra West314 matchesnot enough data
Beth Day + Karla Elliot213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lara Callas
115W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.96
4
Stephanie Wiesing
86W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.88
Stephanie Grace
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Karla Elliot
124W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Debra West
28W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Lenora Louie Phelps
83W–49L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Heidi Mueller
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Candi Carpenito
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Anita Burns
22W–15L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Beth Day
19W–24L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.