Teams

SGV Always On the Line-Lantian-WN/SA10

2026 Tri-Level League - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 12 10:00 AM
Whittier Narrows Tennis Center
Sep 20 10:00 AM
Whittier Narrows Tennis Center
Sep 26 10:00 AM
Whittier Narrows Tennis Center
L#2 DoublesAllan Kim / Jiaxi Li vs Alexander Maguire / Paul Getto1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-23vs SGV Dare Doubles-Pang-WN/SA 10Won 21
W#1 DoublesSean Wang / Jun Wu vs Fredrick Hoang / Jon Pang7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHanxiang Ji / Lantian Xiang vs Nicholas Wang / Steve Chao6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLicheng Dong / Yuchen Hu vs Alex Y Lau / My D Pham6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-25vs SGV Dare Doubles-Pang-WN/SA 10Split 11
L#2 DoublesLicheng Dong / Tianyu Wang vs Steve Chao / Kevin Hung6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAaron Xu / Hanxiang Ji vs Alex Y Lau / Chieu Trinh6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesSean Wang / Aaron Xu vs Sergio Salas / Isaac Williams4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLen Loff / Tianyu Wang vs Paul Getto / Giovanni Leguizamon1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHanxiang Ji / Lantian Xiang vs Jethro Vanda / Andres Romero3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SGV - Men 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGV Always On the Line-Lantian-WN/SA102042650
2SGV Dare Doubles-Pang-WN/SA 1013571595

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Allan Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Zhibo Fang
published
2.54
Lantian Xiang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Hanxiang Ji
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Aaron Xu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.20
Tianyu Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dong Liu
published
Jun Wu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Licheng Dong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allan Kim
4W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
2.85
Zhibo Fang
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Lantian Xiang
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
Hanxiang Ji
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
2.5
Aaron Xu
4W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.45
Tianyu Wang
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Dong Liu
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jun Wu
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Licheng Dong
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.