Teams

Love Stinks

2026 Mixed 40 and Over League · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WEST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-05vs Sultans of SwingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlex Shah / Lily Acoba vs Matt Pike / Angela Pike6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRandall Eckart / Alisa Ward vs Ron Rogers / Maura Ward3-6, 1-6
2026-06-28vs Sultans of SwingLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlex Shah / Lily Acoba vs Thomas Hasslinger / Maura Ward6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRandall Eckart / Alisa Ward vs Harry Harrison / Lenyle Ikeda7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTony Daub / Ruth Kudo vs Lori Mcneel / Michael Wallent3-6, 2-6
2026-06-27vs Sultans of SwingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlex Shah / Lily Acoba vs Ron Rogers / Lenyle Ikeda6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRandall Eckart / Alisa Ward vs Michael Wallent / Lori Mcneel6-7, 3-6
2026-05-31vs Sultans of SwingWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Shah / Lily Acoba vs Thomas Hasslinger / Kiki McNair6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Kaplan / Ruth Kudo vs Matt Pike / Lori Mcneel6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRandall Eckart / Alisa Ward vs Trenten Arnow / Maura Ward2-6, 2-6
2026-05-30vs Sultans of SwingLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlex Shah / Lily Acoba vs Trenten Arnow / Kiki McNair6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTony Daub / Ruth Kudo vs Thomas Hasslinger / Crystal Mather2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRandall Eckart / Kristin Klarc vs Matt Pike / Lori Mcneel7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Love Stinks1451020145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Alex Shah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.07
Alisa Ward
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kristin Klarc
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lily Acoba
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Randall Eckart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Ruth Kudo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tony Daub
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
William Kremers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lily Acoba + Alex Shah7164% gamesnot enough data
Alisa Ward + Randall Eckart044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Shah
19W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
3.5
Alisa Ward
3W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Kristin Klarc
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lily Acoba
25W–17L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randall Eckart
5W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ruth Kudo
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tony Daub
1W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Kremers
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.