Teams

Team 3 Grace's Aces

2022 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-02-20vs Team 2 High RollersLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Blackborow / Andrew Curtis vs Karen Taubenslag / Gregory Rabinovich1-6, 1-6
2022-02-19vs Team 6Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Blackborow / Andrew Curtis vs Heather Carr / Jan Neumann6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesRohan Wadehra / Kelly Blackborow vs Alain Bailey / Stacy Usher2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-26vs Team 5 Low HittersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Blackborow / Rohan Wadehra vs Jorge Prieto Choy / Jenna Hagood6-4, 6-3
2022-01-22vs Team 2 High RollersWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Blackborow / Andrew Curtis vs Matt Stillwagon / Erin Green7-5, 5-3
2022-01-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Blackborow / Avery Schober vs Alice Ling / Bob White6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.87
Avery Schober
published 5
4.56
Landon Schaefer
published
4.48
Martina Dragoytchev
published
4.45
Rohan Wadehra
published
Andrew Curtis
published 4.5
Bavi Sadayappan
published 4.5
4.22
Kyle Truong
published
4.20
Kelly Blackborow
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published 4.5
4.08
Victor Wong
published
3.85
Camryn Kim
published 4
Patrick Hughes
published
Stephanie Evans
published
Zahra Dawson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Manu Balasubramanian
41W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
4.87
5
Avery Schober
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Landon Schaefer
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
4.56
Martina Dragoytchev
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
4.48
Rohan Wadehra
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
4.45
4.5
Andrew Curtis
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Bavi Sadayappan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kyle Truong
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Kelly Blackborow
135W–66L career · 12 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
Victor Wong
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Camryn Kim
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Patrick Hughes
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Evans
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Zahra Dawson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.