Teams

Doubles or Nothing- Zimmerman

2025 Loudoun Doubles Winter Women · Loudoun Doubles Winter 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.89 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-12vs Roellig- Love/LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaramie Richbourg / Debbie McCully vs Stephanie Thomas / Betsy Johnston6-4, 3-4
W#2 DoublesErin Kaplan / Holly Rasmussen vs Terry Cocozza / Kathleen Eickelberg7-5, 5-2
2025-03-06vs 4.0 Fireballs- MarcotteWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Moore / Renee Wall vs Jessica Egenrieder / Jessica Melis6-4, 7-6
2025-02-28vs Okoh-Tisch - Let Love WinWon 10
W#2 DoublesHolly Rasmussen / Julie Jennings vs Keyona Bell / Alison Ouchna6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-17vs Team MassarelliLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Kaplan / Darla Butler vs Catherine Mitchell / Jill Poretz6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRenee Wall / Lisa Zimmerman vs Wendy Massarelli / Christina Schinner4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaramie Richbourg / Debbie McCully vs Ashley Plexico / Eve Weber4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-03vs Roellig- Love/LoveLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Kaufman / Darla Butler vs Paige Bartlett / Stephanie Thomas3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-31vs 4.0 Fireballs- MarcotteWon 10
W#2 DoublesJessica McAllister / Laramie Richbourg vs Holly Glauser / Angela Carbone6-2, 6-4
2025-01-23vs Okoh-Tisch - Let Love WinWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Kaplan / Darla Butler vs Laurie Peacock / Carrie Cardiff3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTina Woods / Holly Rasmussen vs Pamela Nix / Kathleen McFarlane6-4, 6-1
2025-01-13vs Team MassarelliWon 10
W#3 DoublesRenee Wall / Lisa Wolff vs Susan Speciale / Julianne Nitta6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Doubles Winter 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Beth Kaufman
published 4
3.88
Erin Kaplan
published 4
3.88
Andrea Moore
published 4
3.77
Julie Jennings
published
3.66
Debbie McCully
published 4
3.62
Darla Butler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Renee Wall
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Kristin Satterfield
published
3.49
Laramie Richbourg
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Holly Rasmussen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Jennifer Fox
published
3.40
Lisa Wolff
published
3.39
Jessica McAllister
published
3.17
Coni Schaefer
published 3.5
Tina Woods
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Kaplan + Beth Kaufman20365% games+5.2% vs expected
Jessica McAllister + Kristin Satterfield10558% games+4.2% vs expected
Renee Wall + Darla Butler8556% gamesnot enough data
Renee Wall + Erin Kaplan314 matchesnot enough data
Laramie Richbourg + Debbie McCully213 matchesnot enough data
Laramie Richbourg + Renee Wall123 matchesnot enough data
Laramie Richbourg + Darla Butler123 matchesnot enough data
Beth Kaufman + Andrea Moore303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Kaufman
42W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Erin Kaplan
40W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Andrea Moore
35W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
Julie Jennings
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Debbie McCully
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Darla Butler
158W–140L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Renee Wall
232W–249L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
Kristin Satterfield
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
4
Laramie Richbourg
48W–72L career · 3 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Holly Rasmussen
191W–111L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jennifer Fox
14W–24L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.43
Lisa Wolff
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.40
Jessica McAllister
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Coni Schaefer
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Tina Woods
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.