Teams

Timberlake/Wright

2023 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2023-05-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-03vs Hawkins (Day)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Margaret Varga-Roberson / Diane Thorne6-2, 6-3
2023-04-29vs CampbellWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Loretta Lestrange / Sue Griffin6-4, 6-4
2023-04-24vs McCall/MortonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Lara Hanks / Lauren Vollmin6-2, 7-5
2023-04-19vs O'Connell SJP (DAY)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAdair Wright / Kathleen Timberlake vs Beth OConnor / Lori Keipper3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-04-15vs Tatum (55)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Kathleen Glancy / Kim Byrd6-0, 6-2
2023-04-10vs FURR/DURHAMWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Lisa Gilbert vs Kelly Strickland / Kelly Godfrey6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-01vs CampbellWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Dawn Lynch / Elizabeth Gardner6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-29vs HaskinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Lori Haskins / Susan Craig Collins6-1, 6-4
2023-03-25vs Hawkins (Day)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Linda Makowski / Diana Messier6-2, 6-2
2023-03-15vs O'Connell SJP (DAY)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAdair Wright / Kathleen Timberlake vs Kathleen Bradcovich / Lori Keipper6-4, 7-6
2023-03-11vs Tatum (55)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Shannon Zentmeyer / Julianne Assad6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Lisa Elsberry
published
3.90
Kathleen Timberlake
usually #2 Doubles 69%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published 4
Adair Wright
published 4
3.72
Diana Rode
published 4
3.64
Barbara Caropolo
published 4
3.58
Lisa Sottung
published
3.40
Patricia Thomson
published
Lisa Arakelian
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Elsberry
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
4.12
4
Kathleen Timberlake
158W–61L career · 16 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Adair Wright
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Diana Rode
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Barbara Caropolo
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.64
Lisa Sottung
43W–32L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Patricia Thomson
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Lisa Arakelian
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.