Teams

Piedmont

2025 Yadkin Valley Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-05vs Yadkin - ReaganLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Mayer / Kim Littrell vs Jane Oldham / Courtney Rowe2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTamara Fleming / Sarah Groce vs Karen Regan / Dia Roberts4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTelfair Belangia / Kelly McKinley vs Jill Bowman / Mimi Cartee6-3, 6-0
2025-04-05vs Yadkin - ReaganWon 30
W#1 DoublesTamara Fleming / Sarah Groce vs Jane Oldham / Courtney Rowe6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Mayer / Kim Littrell vs Mimi Cartee / Karen Regan6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTelfair Belangia / Kelly McKinley vs Jill Bowman / Dia Roberts7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-08vs Yadkin - ReaganLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Gaines / Susan Koehler vs Penny Johnson / Vickie Lents2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBeth Harris / Beth Mayer vs Aundrea Hendley / Kissie Stroup3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTamara Fleming / Michelle Porter vs Linda Helms / Dee Wilson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Yadkin - ReaganLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Gaines / Susan Koehler vs Linda Helms / Dee Wilson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Harris / Beth Mayer vs Penny Johnson / Vickie Lents6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTamara Fleming / Michelle Porter vs Aundrea Hendley / Kissie Stroup3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Telfair Belangia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Beth Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Beth Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.06
Susan Koehler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Kim Littrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.97
Michelle Porter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Tamara Fleming
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Sarah Groce
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kelly Gaines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly McKinley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Mayer + Beth Harris7355% games−7.0% vs expected
Kelly Gaines + Susan Koehler224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Telfair Belangia
12W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Beth Harris
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Beth Mayer
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
4.07
Susan Koehler
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%67%<1%
4.06
Kim Littrell
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
Michelle Porter
29W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
Tamara Fleming
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
Sarah Groce
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.83
Kelly Gaines
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly McKinley
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.