Teams

Van Daniker - Nothing but Love

2025 Hampton Roads Combo Mixed · Hampton Roads Combo Mixed 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-25vs Jennings - Seven Five MixologyLost 01
L#1 DoublesAl Craft / Alyse Chickey vs Chelsea Jennings / Thomas Allen3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-11-18vs VuDoo SquadWon 21
W#1 DoublesTommy VanDaniker / Claire Walters vs Christopher Dimaya / Stephanie Granger7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Erguiza / Johanna Pilapil vs Ronald Nave / Sheryl Harris1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCourtney Violette / Adam Newman vs Franklyn Collins / Marie Nave6-3, 6-2
2025-11-11vs VuDoo SquadWon 10
W#1 DoublesAl Craft / Alyse Chickey vs Rogelio Valdez / Shielito Riodique6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-11vs Bracey - Mixed CocktailLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Al Craft vs Caroline Dozier / Monte Lehmkuhler1-6, 3-6
2025-10-14vs Jennings - Seven Five MixologyLost 01
L#3 DoublesAl Craft / Alyse Chickey vs Yuli Reams / Renald Castro3-6, 4-6
2025-10-07vs VuDoo SquadLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Erguiza / Alyse Chickey vs Rogelio Valdez / Marie Nave5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-30vs Bracey - Mixed CocktailLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Michael Erguiza vs Nicole Legum / Monte Lehmkuhler6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Courtney Violette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Claire Walters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Michael Erguiza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Alyse Chickey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Karen van Daniker
published
3.47
Tommy VanDaniker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Long
published 3.5
3.08
Johanna Pilapil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Adam Newman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Violette
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
4
Claire Walters
25W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.04
Michael Erguiza
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Alyse Chickey
98W–58L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Karen van Daniker
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
3.48
Tommy VanDaniker
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Elizabeth Long
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Johanna Pilapil
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Adam Newman
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.